Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

feat(vault): open any CID from a link or paste, with trustless-gateway fallback

未关闭
#54 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

@ishikabhoyar 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年10月22日。

  • #83 来自 @ishikabhoyar —— 未关闭

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
javascript

调研方向

Start by reading features/ipfs/lib/helia-init.ts to see how Helia is initialized, then trace the existing vault page and content decoding flow. Implement the CID route, gateway configuration, validation, and verified fetch with mocked gateway tests. Done means a valid remotely pinned CID opens in a fresh profile, invalid CIDs and unreachable gateways show distinct messages, and fetched content is verified before display.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

enhancement helia storage tier-2

Summary

Add a page that resolves a CID that is not in the local blockstore, so shared results open without the sender's browser.

Estimated size: M

Motivation

Today a CID shared with another user resolves only if they obtain the block by other means.

Current state in this repo

  • Helia runs with createHelia({ blockstore, datastore }) and no custom libp2p or block-broker configuration (features/ipfs/lib/helia-init.ts).

Proposal

  • Add /vault/cid/[cid] with a paste box.
  • Configure the trustless-gateway block broker with a configurable gateway list (env).
  • Show a verified-against-CID indicator and cache fetched blocks locally.
  • Validate the CID and the decoded record schema.

Acceptance criteria

  • A CID published and pinned elsewhere opens on a fresh browser profile.
  • Invalid CIDs and unreachable gateways give distinct messages.
  • A fetched block is verified against its CID before display.

Out of scope

  • Browser-to-browser transports (see the Kubo browser-connectivity issue).

Technical notes and risks

  • Gateway choice affects privacy (the gateway sees the CID); document it.

Dependencies

  • None; can be picked up independently.

Testing plan

  • Mocked gateway tests; one manual cross-profile check.

Part of #43. Ground rules for the content layer: no secrets in the repo, content-layer failures must never block or discard quantum execution, and tests and docs ship with every PR.

主要语言
Python
星标
2
派生
4
平均合并
5 小时 19 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
11

环境准备

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

QMeshPy/distributed-quantum 的其他 Issue

查看 QMeshPy/distributed-quantum 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。