InternVideo-NeXt clip_projector training procedure: eval only? from scratch?
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 25/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- huggingface, python
调研方向
从链接的 Hugging Face modeling_internvideo_next.py 文件和 InternVideo2/single_modality/run_linear_probing.py 开始,然后将它们的 projector 行为与论文的 B.2 和 4.2 节进行比较。完成标准是记录 clip_projector 的训练数据、评估使用的是从头训练的权重还是预训练权重,以及哪种设置产生了报告中的结果。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Dear authors,
Thanks for your interesting paper!
I see you mention in your paper in section B.2 of the appendix that you train an attention pooling head for evaluation.
At the same time, I see that the model you released on HuggingFace has a clip_projector module (AttentionPoolingBlock) attached to it, and in the forward of the model you set projected=True (HF code here)
What I would like to know is:
- on what data was this release clip_projector trained?
- if I want to evaluate your model on action recognition, should I:
a. train the attentive probe from scratch on the target dataset
b. finetune the attentive probe on the target dataset (if so, from which weights?) - which setup did you use in your paper, 2.a. or 2.b., or none of them?
You released some action recognition code for InternVideo2 and for linear probing / attention probing there is this --open_clip_projector parameter which controls whether you're finetuning the head, or not. But this doesn't say on which data the head was trained before the finetuning.
You mention in the paper in section 4.2 (Video Classification)
We test the model in an ‘Attentive Probing’ setting
where the encoders are frozen and a single-layer attention
pooling head is trained. Such Frozen Encoder settings can
test representation’s quality in an unbiased way. Our methods achieve the best results with only public data and less
computation cost on these foundation tasks.
What would make sense to me is that you're not using the Internvideo2 evaluation script anymore and you're training the attentive probe from scratch (2.a. mentioned above). But if so, I'd like to know on which evaluation experiment the weights of the release clip_projector were obtained.
Thanks in advance for your clarifications!
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 2.4k
- 派生
- 160
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
OpenGVLab/InternVideo 的其他 Issue
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
OpenGVLab/InternVideo#324 · 1 条评论 ·
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 20/100
OpenGVLab/InternVideo#323 ·
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
OpenGVLab/InternVideo#322 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 42/100
OpenGVLab/InternVideo#321 ·
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
OpenGVLab/InternVideo#319 · 1 条评论 ·
查看 OpenGVLab/InternVideo 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
area: harness bug status: needs-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
Human-Agent-Society/reef#625 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 80/100
learningequality/kolibri#15351 · 2 条评论 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
Name consistency 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
eellak/triplestore#65 · 1 条评论 ·