KineticForces - Read the kinetic file's zeff dataset
维护者通常 3 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 22/100
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 领域
- data
调研方向
Start with resolve_ntv_species and the [KineticForces] zimp and mimp settings, then trace how zpitch and multi_ion_composition consume Zeff. The first step is a design decision: record what a supplied Zeff means for zpitch when Zeff is at or above zimp, and for the impurity density and collision frequencies. Done means the NTV path reads the file's zeff under that rule, logs its source, and is covered by a test with and without the dataset, with docs/src/kinetic_forces.md updated.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
The kinetic profile file can carry an optional zeff dataset, which the SLAYER layer and the resistive-layer overlap scan prefer to their own closure (PR #298). The NTV path does not read it: resolve_ntv_species always derives Zeff from quasi-neutrality with one impurity ([KineticForces] zimp, mimp). One run can therefore use two Zeff profiles: the file's in the tearing analysis and the closure's in the NTV torque.
Why this is more than a one-line change:
- In the NTV path Zeff comes with the pitch-angle factor
zpitchand the impurity density frommulti_ion_composition, and the collision frequencies use all three. Overriding Zeff alone would leave them inconsistent. zpitchhas a pole at Zeff = zimp, so a supplied Zeff abovezimpneeds a defined behaviour.- The impurity charge is set twice, as
[KineticForces] zimp(integer) and[SLAYER] zimp(float). They should become one setting, or be documented as deliberately separate.
Done when:
- A rule is recorded for what a supplied Zeff means for
zpitch, the impurity density and the collision frequencies. - The NTV path uses the file's
zeffunder that rule and logs which source it used. - A test covers a file with and without the dataset.
-
docs/src/kinetic_forces.mdstates the precedence for both paths.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
- 主要语言
- Julia
- 星标
- 11
- 派生
- 7
- 平均合并
- 4 天 3 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 70
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 没有贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC 的其他 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 82/100
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#644 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 35/100
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#643 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
PerturbedEquilibrium - FEATURE - Complete the resistive perturbed-equilibrium workflow from Galerkin and matched results可能已有人在做 @matt-pharr 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭feature
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#635 · 1 条评论 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
test
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#633 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
Tearing - FEATURE - Add a general modified Rutherford equation for island evolution可能已有人在做 @StuartBenjamin 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭feature
OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC#630 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
查看 OpenFUSIONToolkit/GPEC 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
`ShallowWaterModel` allocates ~9 KiB per grid point per RK3 stage on the CPU可能已有人在做 @ali-ramadhan 今天认领。 未关闭performance 🏍️
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
CliMA/Oceananigans.jl#6421 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
JuliaQUBO/QUBOLib.jl#105 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 62/100
NCAR/musica#1118 · 1 条评论 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
`AMSGrad` state starts at `epsilon` instead of zero, so zero gradients move parameters and small gradients are damped可能已有人在做 @parth-patel010 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
FluxML/Optimisers.jl#247 · 1 条评论 ·
-
README should say that row and column order must match可能已有人在做 @SAUMYARSH 于 1 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 84/100