Expose selected decoder plugin and backend per decoded sample

未关闭
#64 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
38/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
cpp, python

调研方向

Start by reading the generic decoder API around nvimgcodecDecoderDecode, nvimgcodecFutureGetProcessingStatus, and nvimgcodecExecutionParams_t, then compare the Python get_decoder_ids() API and the cuCIM workaround described in the issue. Define how per-sample plugin and backend provenance, fallback information, and results after completion should fit the C and Python APIs. Done means callers can query those details for successful and failed samples while preserving generic per-sample dispatch.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Request

Please expose the decoder plugin identifier and backend kind that actually handled each sample submitted through the generic decoder API.

Motivation

Applications that audit heterogeneous decode pipelines need to distinguish GPU-only, hybrid CPU/GPU, and CPU fallback execution without inferring it from the codec, output buffer, or installed extensions. The generic decoder can fall through registered implementations in priority order, and a batch can contain per-sample choices.

Current API boundary

With nvImageCodec 0.9, nvimgcodecDecoderDecode plus nvimgcodecFutureGetProcessingStatus reports only processing status. nvimgcodecExecutionParams_t::backends can constrain backend kinds, but the selected nvimgcodecDecoderDesc_t::id and backend_kind are not returned.

Current documentation also provides plugin enumeration/selection (get_decoder_ids() in Python and plugin selections/framework queries in the newer C API), which is useful for configuration but still does not identify the implementation selected after generic fallback.

Suggested shape

A future/result query returning, for each submitted sample:

  • selected decoder plugin ID;
  • selected backend kind;
  • whether fallback occurred (and optionally rejected candidates/statuses).

The query should remain valid after the decode completes and should work for both success and failure. An equivalent Python result/property would be useful.

Workaround and limitation

cuCIM can create separate generic decoders restricted to one backend kind and probe/decode in an explicit order. That provides truthful backend provenance but changes selection to a caller policy, cannot identify the plugin within that backend, and cannot preserve arbitrary per-sample mixed-backend dispatch in a single batch.

主要语言
Jupyter Notebook
星标
164
派生
26
平均合并
27 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 没有 Pull Request 模板
  • 阅读贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

NVIDIA/nvImageCodec 的其他 Issue

查看 NVIDIA/nvImageCodec 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Backend & API Design Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。