Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

PasswordResetToken rows are never deleted after use, inconsistent with OTPToken cleanup

未关闭
#932 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
58/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
typescript

调研方向

Read application/backend/src/controllers/UsersController.ts around resetPassword, then compare its token handling with AuthController.loginOtp and the OTPToken deletion described in the issue. Decide and implement consistent cleanup for used password-reset tokens; verify the reset flow no longer leaves used rows behind.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

backend question

UsersController.resetPassword in application/backend/src/controllers/UsersController.ts marks a used token via passwordResetTokenRepo.update({ ..., data: { used: true } }) but never deletes the row. Every password reset ever completed sits in the PasswordResetToken table indefinitely, and there's no scheduled cleanup for used or expired tokens either.

Meanwhile, in the same codebase, AuthController.loginOtp explicitly deletes the OTP token on use: await prisma.oTPToken.delete({ where: { id: otp.id } }). So there are two auth tokens with two different retention policies in the same file tree, presumably not deliberately.

Impact:

  • Storage growth is unbounded over time. Probably minor at CTRL's current scale but grows forever.
  • Minor data-exposure surface: a DB dump reveals when each user reset their password (userId + timestamp trails), even after the tokens themselves are used: true and useless for a real reset attempt.
主要语言
TypeScript
星标
4
派生
0
平均合并
14 小时 50 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
5

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

Garvan-Data-Science-Platform/ctrl 的其他 Issue

查看 Garvan-Data-Science-Platform/ctrl 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。