Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Generate predictions for responses with non-numeric human scores

未关闭
#341 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞

调研方向

首先阅读现有的 RSMPredict 入口点和训练文件流程,以了解当前模型的训练方式以及预测的生成方式。为非数值型人工评分定义单一的 train-then-predict 路径,将 confusion-matrix 的使用作为相关的完成检查,同时保留关于大多数评估的既有限制。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

enhancement

[by @aoifecahill ] It would be nice if it was possible to automatically generate predictions for data that has non-numeric human scores. Obviously these predictions can't be used in most of the evaluations, but they could be useful in a confusion matrix for example.

I know RSMPredict does predictions, but that's not quite what I was looking for. It would be nice if there was just one tool that trained a model using the training file and then ran RSMPredict on the test file. I don't think anything like that already exists? I don't really care much about the evaluation (though the confusion matrix would be interesting), rather just would like the convenience of being able to do train+predict in one step rather than multiple with hacks (since I don't know of a way to just train a model without having a fake test file for rsmtool?)

This is a nice-to-have issue.

主要语言
Python
星标
71
派生
21
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

EducationalTestingService/rsmtool 的其他 Issue

查看 EducationalTestingService/rsmtool 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。