Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Could the TC Fragment be stored in the latency buffer based on the trigger time?

未关闭
#136 7 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

@ArturSztuc 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2025年3月17日。

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

描述

(This is a topic for post-v3.0.0, and it relates to long-window-readout [when the readout of the data for a trigger is split into a sequence of TriggerRecords].
The title of this Issue makes an assumption about how TC fragments are handled within the Trigger App. If that assumption turns out to be wrong, I will correct the title. The text below describes what is desired without going into details of how things might work under the covers.)

Currently, when we run with long readout windows and split the data into a sequence of TriggerRecords, the TC Fragment has meaningful contents for only one of the N TriggerRecord in the sequence of TRs. The TC fragment is empty for the other N-1 TRs in the sequence. (This has been discussed elsewhere.) And at the moment, the non-empty TC Fragment appears in the first TR of the sequence.

Could the non-empty TC Fragment instead appear in the TriggerRecord that spans the trigger time? That might better match what users expect...

主要语言
C++
星标
0
派生
8
平均合并
3 小时 50 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

DUNE-DAQ/trigger 的其他 Issue

查看 DUNE-DAQ/trigger 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C++ Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。