Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Positioning new windows based on the BOB display's x and y properties

未关闭
#3,871 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 2 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
30/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
冷清
技术栈
java
领域
desktop

调研方向

Start with the cited DockItemRepresentation.java code and trace how command-line launches with target=window are handled. Compare that path with the ActionButton behavior for position and dimensions. The issue asks whether to change the default or add an opt-in preference, so the intended behavior needs agreement before implementation can be considered done.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

When a display is launched from the command line and opened as a 'New Window', i.e. phoebus -resource file:/xx/xxx/file.bob?target=window, it will always be positioned at the default x=50, y=50 location on the monitor.

However, when you open a display from an ActionButton in the 'New Window' mode, it reads the x and y defined in the BOB file and positions that display in that location:
https://github.com/ControlSystemStudio/phoebus/blob/31059edc069e5d1df75202c1d6f31972e0a5b868/app/display/runtime/src/main/java/org/csstudio/display/builder/runtime/app/DockItemRepresentation.java#L65

The same is also true of width & height. Opening from an ActionButton will open the window with dimensions based on the BOB display's width and height properties:
https://github.com/ControlSystemStudio/phoebus/blob/31059edc069e5d1df75202c1d6f31972e0a5b868/app/display/runtime/src/main/java/org/csstudio/display/builder/runtime/app/DockItemRepresentation.java#L86
, while launching from a terminal using the default 1600 x 900 dimensions.

These two behaviors seem inconsistent. While I know that you can manually specify the width, height, x and y from the command line, I was wondering whether the default behavior when launching a new window from the terminal should be to position the new window at the x and y defined in the model and resize the window accordingly?

This was also what used to be done by CS-Studio when you opened with Position=NEW_SHELL in the command line argument.

Any thoughts on whether this would be a reasonable thing to do? It would impact the existing behavior so we may need to use an 'opt in' preference.

主要语言
Java
星标
130
派生
132
平均合并
2 天 11 小时
30 天内合并 PR
19

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

ControlSystemStudio/phoebus 的其他 Issue

查看 ControlSystemStudio/phoebus 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。