B2 SDK docs: consolidate duplicated contributor guidance into one canonical source
维护者通常 1 天内回复
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 18/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- python
调研方向
Start by comparing CONTRIBUTING.md with doc/source/contributing.rst and checking the session list against noxfile.py, which exposes the drift the issue describes. The work is already under way in pull request #603, so read that first and avoid duplicating it. Done means the maintainers have picked one canonical source, the second format is generated or included from it, or a parity check exists for the shared commands and supported versions.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Description
CONTRIBUTING.md and doc/source/contributing.rst independently duplicate environment setup, Nox sessions, Python support, testing, and documentation commands. They have already drifted: the Sphinx page contains a nonexistent deploy session, while the Markdown file contains dependency-management, lockfile, changelog-fragment, and filtered-test instructions missing from the Sphinx page. Because both appear authoritative, correcting one file does not reliably correct the contributor experience.
Steps to reproduce
1. Compare CONTRIBUTING.md with doc/source/contributing.rst section by section.
2. Check the session lists against noxfile.py.
3. Check whether dependency and changelog guidance appears in both documents.
Expected behavior
Choose and document one canonical source. Either include or generate the second representation from it, or add an automated parity check for deliberately duplicated facts such as commands and supported versions. Preserve a short GitHub-friendly entry point while keeping the full published contributor guide discoverable.
Actual behavior
Maintainers must update two formats manually, and there is no check that they remain equivalent. Readers already receive different command and release guidance depending on which copy they open, demonstrating that the duplication has become a correctness problem rather than only editorial overhead.
Environment
- Python version: Not applicable
- b2sdk version:
masteratf3ab7b71 - OS: Not applicable
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 214
- 派生
- 68
- 平均合并
- 51 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 6
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
Backblaze/b2-sdk-python 的其他 Issue
-
Download and copy sync actions print remote file names without escape_control_chars可能已有人在做 @dreyfus92 于 15 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
Backblaze/b2-sdk-python#631 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
SqliteAccountInfo profile name validation uses "re.match", so only the first character is checked可能已有人在做 @nazarli-shabnam 于 9 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
Backblaze/b2-sdk-python#629 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Adopt the AI-native SDLC and repository policies可能已有人在做 @goanpeca 于 18 天前认领。 未关闭enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 20/100
Backblaze/b2-sdk-python#634 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 50/100
Backblaze/b2-sdk-python#630 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
ci: cli-compat fails — 4 sse/sync integration tests broken in B2_Command_Line_Tool (all environments)可能重新可做 @ffumero2003 于 37 天前认领，目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭bug testing
Backblaze/b2-sdk-python#627 · 2 条评论 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 Backblaze/b2-sdk-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 72/100
btclib-org/btclib-node#2505 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
open-webui/open-webui#34462 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
gorakhargosh/watchdog#1462 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 85/100
openwisp/openwisp-monitoring#889 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
IETF-Hackathon/pqc-certificates#351 ·
维护者通常 2 天内回复