AzureStorage: a permanent history-load failure in ScheduleOrchestrationStatePrefetch increases memory without limit
维护者通常 3 天内回复
评估
调研方向
Start in OrchestrationSessionManager.ScheduleOrchestrationStatePrefetch, in the catch block that logs OrchestrationProcessingFailure, sleeps, and then awaits Task.Run on a recursive call. The retry chain is what keeps each failed attempt's exception alive. The issue says a fix is already in #1418, so check that pull request before starting. Done means a history-load failure that never recovers no longer grows the set of retained exceptions, which the always-failing tracking-store test in #1418 checks.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Summary
When OrchestrationSessionManager.ScheduleOrchestrationStatePrefetch cannot load the history of a pending batch, it logs OrchestrationProcessingFailure and waits 5 seconds. Then it awaits a recursive call of itself in the catch block:
catch (Exception e)
{
this.settings.Logger.OrchestrationProcessingFailure(...);
// Sleep briefly to avoid a tight failure loop.
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
// This is a background operation so failure is not an option. All exceptions must be handled.
// To avoid starvation, we need to re-enqueue this async operation instead of retrying in a loop.
await Task.Run(() => this.ScheduleOrchestrationStatePrefetch(node, traceActivityId, cancellationToken));
}
If the failure is permanent, no attempt completes. Each failed attempt then stays in memory, and memory increases without a limit while the process runs.
Cause
- The
catchblock containsawait. Thus, the compiler keeps the caught exception in a state-machine field (<>7__wrap2). The code clears this field only after the awaited recursive call completes. Task.Run(Func<Task>)returns a proxy task (UnwrapPromise). The proxy completes only when the inner task completes.- Thus, each attempt keeps the previous attempt. Each exception keeps its
Azure.RequestFailedExceptionand theAzure.Response(HTTP request, response, headers, and content stream). - The path from the GC root is: timer queue ->
Task+DelayPromise(the 5-second delay) -> newest state machine ->UnwrapPromise-> older state machine -> ... -> oldest state machine.
The awaited recursion came from #633. Before #633, the retry put a new work item in a DispatchQueue and then returned. Thus, a failed attempt did not wait for the next attempt.
Affected versions
DurableTask.AzureStorage 1.9.4 and later. The retry code is the same in 2.0.0, 2.10.0, and main (99296e0f).
What we saw
- A worker process on DurableTask.AzureStorage 2.0.0 (.NET 10) ran for 14 days. A full-memory dump had 239,392 live
AsyncStateMachineBox<...<ScheduleOrchestrationStatePrefetch>d__25>objects. It had the same number ofDurableTaskStorageException,Azure.RequestFailedException,HttpRequestMessage, andHttpResponseMessageobjects. Together they used about 2.7 GB, which was almost all of the live managed heap. - One orchestration instance caused all of it. Its history referred to a large-message blob that did not exist (404
BlobNotFound). 239,392 attempts x 5.04 seconds = the process uptime.
Repro
Use Microsoft.Azure.DurableTask.AzureStorage 2.0.0, Microsoft.Azure.DurableTask.Core 3.0.0, and Azurite:
- Start an orchestration that calls an activity. The activity returns a string of 50,000 characters, so the History row stores the result in the
{taskhub}-largemessagescontainer. Then the orchestration waits for an external event. - Delete the result blob of that History row.
- Raise an event to the instance.
Result:
| Time after the event | Failed attempts | Live prefetch state machines | Live exception pairs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 s | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 210 s | 40 | 40 | 40 |
The heap increased by about 12 KB for each attempt. When the same blob was uploaded again, the next attempt was successful, and all the retained objects were released.
The new unit test in #1418 shows the same behavior with a tracking store that always fails. Without the fix, all 19 earlier exceptions stay in memory.
Triggers
Each history-load failure that does not stop causes this problem. Examples:
- A History row refers to a large-message blob that does not exist. In 2.0.0, one cause is a late message for an execution that
ContinueAsNewreplaced. #1189 fixed that case in 2.1.0. A missing blob of the current execution has the same effect in 2.10.0 andmain. - A permanent authorization failure (403), a missing History table, or invalid event data.
Other notes
- No setting controls this retry. The delay does not use the cancellation token.
- A partition lease move does not stop the retries. A new owner of the partition can start its own chain for the same instance.
Related
- #1215 (the same stack trace), #802, and #1189.
- Fix: #1418
- 主要语言
- C#
- 星标
- 1.7k
- 派生
- 338
- 平均合并
- 4 天 13 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 10
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
Azure/durabletask 的其他 Issue
-
Azure Storage backend: ExecutionTerminated message is never deleted when the Instances row is absent, causing permanent control-queue poison (regression in 2.7.0 from #1256)可能已有人在做 @sean0407 于 7 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
Azure/durabletask#1398 · 2 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
Azure Storage backend: control queue partition left unowned for hours/days after lease expires可能重新可做 @nytian 于 49 天前认领,目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭
Azure/durabletask#1389 · 1 条评论 · 已指派 1 人 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
Azure/durabletask#1332 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 58/100
Azure/durabletask#1318 · 1 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
-
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
Azure/durabletask#1301 · 3 条评论 ·
维护者通常 3 天内回复
查看 Azure/durabletask 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
bug priority: P2
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 77/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Docs] README/PRIVACY still name AppCenter although v1.5.6.0+ uses the Microsoft Store Services SDK未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
needs-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
Azure/azure-sdk-tools#17317 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Test
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 69/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复