[BUG] - Handler.close livelocks on FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED while holding the ReactorConnection monitor
维护者通常 1 天内回复
@conniey 已经在做这个了。
开始于 2026年10月20日。
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。
描述
[BUG] Handler.close livelocks on FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED while holding the ReactorConnection monitor
Describe the bug
Handler.close() retries endpointStates.emitNext(CLOSED) forever when the result is FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED. ReactorConnection.closeConnectionWork() calls close() while holding the connection monitor (private synchronized). If reactor-executor is already inside emitNext on that same sink, the retry never succeeds, the monitor is never released, and the reactor thread blocks forever in getOrCreateConnection().
The loop uses about one core and allocates on the order of 1 GiB/s of log events. It does not time out. In the occurrence below it ran until the process was restarted, more than a day later. Message settlement on that connection stopped for the whole interval.
This is not #39999. That report is the Event Hubs buffered producer logging FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED, retrying a bounded number of times, and then failing the send. Handler.close() returns true with no limit and no backoff, and it does so while holding the connection monitor.
Exception or Stack Trace
No exception escapes. The close path logs this once per retry:
WebSocketsConnectionHandler {"az.sdk.message":"Could not emit closed endpoint state. Non-serial access. Retrying.","connectionId":"MF_b63740_...","signalType":"onNext","emitResult":"FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED"}
About 3.4e7 of those lines were written in the first 50 seconds, and about 1.1e8 in the first 2.5 minutes. The thread stayed in this state after that.
Application thread, RUNNABLE, about one core. Top of the dump, 50 seconds into the loop:
com.azure.core.util.logging.LoggingEventBuilder.log(LoggingEventBuilder.java:208)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.Handler.lambda$close$0(Handler.java:157)
reactor.core.publisher.InternalManySink.emitNext(InternalManySink.java:32)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.Handler.close(Handler.java:154)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.closeConnectionWork(ReactorConnection.java:627)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.lambda$closeAsync$2(ReactorConnection.java:595)
...
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection$ReactorExceptionHandler.onConnectionError(ReactorConnection.java:760)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.lambda$getOrCreateConnection$2(ReactorConnection.java:716)
...
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorDispatcher.signalWorkQueue(ReactorDispatcher.java:160)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorDispatcher.invoke(ReactorDispatcher.java:111)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ProtonSession.open(ProtonSession.java:177)
reactor-executor-3, BLOCKED entering the same monitor, for the whole interval. CPU time flat. Lock owner is the application thread above.
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.getOrCreateConnection(ReactorConnection.java:688)
...
reactor.core.publisher.InternalManySink.emitNext(InternalManySink.java:27)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.Handler.onNext(Handler.java:103)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.ConnectionHandler.onConnectionRemoteOpen(ConnectionHandler.java:335)
org.apache.qpid.proton.reactor.impl.ReactorImpl.process(ReactorImpl.java:291)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorExecutor.run(ReactorExecutor.java:91)
Line numbers are azure-core-amqp 2.11.3. The same structure is still on main: close() returns true only for FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED, and both closeConnectionWork() and getOrCreateConnection() are private synchronized.
To Reproduce
Intermittent. Seen more than once on a ServiceBusProcessorClient workload that settles on an application thread pool by calling ServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon() / complete() (both block()). Not reproduced on demand.
Code Snippet
Application side, one call per message, off the reactor thread:
messageContext.abandon(); // ServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon -> receiverClient.abandon(...).block()
What the SDK then does, from 2.11.3:
// Handler.close — only FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED retries, and it retries without a bound
endpointStates.emitNext(EndpointState.CLOSED, (signalType, emitResult) -> {
if (emitResult == Sinks.EmitResult.FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED) {
logger.atInfo()...log("Could not emit closed endpoint state. Non-serial access. Retrying.");
return true;
}
return false;
});
// Reactor's InternalManySink.emitNext
for (;;) {
Sinks.EmitResult emitResult = tryEmitNext(value);
if (emitResult.isSuccess()) {
return;
}
if (failureHandler.onEmitFailure(SignalType.ON_NEXT, emitResult)) {
continue;
}
// ...
}
// ReactorConnection.closeAsync — caller runs closeConnectionWork when the dispatcher rejects the schedule
if (dispatcher != null) {
try {
dispatcher.invoke(() -> closeConnectionWork());
} catch (IOException | RejectedExecutionException e) {
closeConnectionWork(); // synchronized, calls handler.close()
}
}
ReactorDispatcher.signalWorkQueue is what raises the error that enters onConnectionError. A ClosedChannelException on the proton IO pipe, before the reactor is marked closed, becomes:
connectionId[...] IO Sink was interrupted before reactor closed.
Timeline from client logs. Host name omitted. t0 is the first failed abandon().
| Time | Thread | Log |
|---|---|---|
| t0 | application threads blocked in abandon() |
ReactiveException / InterruptedException from Mono.block at ServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon |
| t0 + 35 ms | those threads | ReactorDispatcher instance is closed for connection MF_f318b1, then onConnectionError, Starting new reactor: IO Sink was interrupted before reactor closed. isTransient=false, isInitiatedByClient=false. onConnectionRemoteClose for this connection has no AMQP error condition |
| t0 + 579 ms | reactor-executor-3 |
onConnectionRemoteOpen for the replacement connection MF_b63740 |
| t0 + 624 ms | application thread | Same IO Sink was interrupted onConnectionError for MF_b63740, then Could not schedule closeConnection work. Manually disposing. |
| t0 + 626 ms onward | that application thread | Could not emit closed endpoint state. Non-serial access. Retrying., signalType=onNext, emitResult=FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED, until process restart |
reactor-executor-3 is still inside the onConnectionRemoteOpen emit when close() emits CLOSED. tryEmitNext returns FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED. The handler returns true, so emitNext spins, still inside synchronized closeConnectionWork(). The reactor thread cannot leave its own emit, because a downstream subscriber is blocked on that same monitor in getOrCreateConnection().
No log in the window matched amqp:connection:forced, a link detach error, a timeout, or a transport error condition.
Expected behavior
Handler.close() should stop retrying. A failed CLOSED emit should not hold the ReactorConnection monitor or pin a reactor thread. Connection recovery should be able to finish, and abandon() / complete() should complete or fail instead of livelocking.
Setup (please complete the following information):
- OS: Linux
- Library/Libraries:
com.azure:azure-messaging-servicebus:7.17.17, which pullscom.azure:azure-core-amqp:2.11.3.reactor-core3.7.x (InternalManySink.emitNextstill busy-loops when the handler returnstrue) - Java version: HotSpot, JDK 15+ lambda frame form (
$$Lambda/0x...) - Frameworks: none.
ServiceBusProcessorClient, blockingabandon()/complete()from an application executor - Also checked:
azure-messaging-servicebus7.18.1 /azure-core-amqp2.12.2, and current main.Handler.close,ReactorConnection.closeConnectionWork, andgetOrCreateConnectionare unchanged. 7.18.1 still calls.block()fromServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon()andcomplete()
Information Checklist
- Bug Description Added
- Repro Steps Added
- Setup information Added
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 2.6k
- 派生
- 2.2k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 18 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 231
环境准备
在浏览器里用你自己的 GitHub 账号启动这个项目的开发容器。
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java 的其他 Issue
-
mgmt, in track 1 migration guide, call out that file-based authentication method is not recommended可能重新可做 关联的 PR 已关闭且未合并。 未关闭Azure.Identity
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 74/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#48894 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Azure.Core HttpClient
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 52/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50961 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Azure.Core.V2 clientcore
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50936 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
clientcore
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50935 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
clientcore
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50934 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 Azure/azure-sdk-for-java 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
dev/release: verify-release-candidate.sh runs 0 Java tests with Debian's Maven可能已有人在做 @kou 今天认领。 未关闭Type: bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
apache/arrow-adbc#4947 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
lysine-dev/okhttp#9814 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
checkstyle/checkstyle#22153 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 79/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复