[BUG] - Handler.close livelocks on FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED while holding the ReactorConnection monitor
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@conniey ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 20/10/2026.
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.
Descripción
[BUG] Handler.close livelocks on FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED while holding the ReactorConnection monitor
Describe the bug
Handler.close() retries endpointStates.emitNext(CLOSED) forever when the result is FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED. ReactorConnection.closeConnectionWork() calls close() while holding the connection monitor (private synchronized). If reactor-executor is already inside emitNext on that same sink, the retry never succeeds, the monitor is never released, and the reactor thread blocks forever in getOrCreateConnection().
The loop uses about one core and allocates on the order of 1 GiB/s of log events. It does not time out. In the occurrence below it ran until the process was restarted, more than a day later. Message settlement on that connection stopped for the whole interval.
This is not #39999. That report is the Event Hubs buffered producer logging FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED, retrying a bounded number of times, and then failing the send. Handler.close() returns true with no limit and no backoff, and it does so while holding the connection monitor.
Exception or Stack Trace
No exception escapes. The close path logs this once per retry:
WebSocketsConnectionHandler {"az.sdk.message":"Could not emit closed endpoint state. Non-serial access. Retrying.","connectionId":"MF_b63740_...","signalType":"onNext","emitResult":"FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED"}
About 3.4e7 of those lines were written in the first 50 seconds, and about 1.1e8 in the first 2.5 minutes. The thread stayed in this state after that.
Application thread, RUNNABLE, about one core. Top of the dump, 50 seconds into the loop:
com.azure.core.util.logging.LoggingEventBuilder.log(LoggingEventBuilder.java:208)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.Handler.lambda$close$0(Handler.java:157)
reactor.core.publisher.InternalManySink.emitNext(InternalManySink.java:32)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.Handler.close(Handler.java:154)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.closeConnectionWork(ReactorConnection.java:627)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.lambda$closeAsync$2(ReactorConnection.java:595)
...
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection$ReactorExceptionHandler.onConnectionError(ReactorConnection.java:760)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.lambda$getOrCreateConnection$2(ReactorConnection.java:716)
...
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorDispatcher.signalWorkQueue(ReactorDispatcher.java:160)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorDispatcher.invoke(ReactorDispatcher.java:111)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ProtonSession.open(ProtonSession.java:177)
reactor-executor-3, BLOCKED entering the same monitor, for the whole interval. CPU time flat. Lock owner is the application thread above.
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorConnection.getOrCreateConnection(ReactorConnection.java:688)
...
reactor.core.publisher.InternalManySink.emitNext(InternalManySink.java:27)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.Handler.onNext(Handler.java:103)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.handler.ConnectionHandler.onConnectionRemoteOpen(ConnectionHandler.java:335)
org.apache.qpid.proton.reactor.impl.ReactorImpl.process(ReactorImpl.java:291)
com.azure.core.amqp.implementation.ReactorExecutor.run(ReactorExecutor.java:91)
Line numbers are azure-core-amqp 2.11.3. The same structure is still on main: close() returns true only for FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED, and both closeConnectionWork() and getOrCreateConnection() are private synchronized.
To Reproduce
Intermittent. Seen more than once on a ServiceBusProcessorClient workload that settles on an application thread pool by calling ServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon() / complete() (both block()). Not reproduced on demand.
Code Snippet
Application side, one call per message, off the reactor thread:
messageContext.abandon(); // ServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon -> receiverClient.abandon(...).block()
What the SDK then does, from 2.11.3:
// Handler.close — only FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED retries, and it retries without a bound
endpointStates.emitNext(EndpointState.CLOSED, (signalType, emitResult) -> {
if (emitResult == Sinks.EmitResult.FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED) {
logger.atInfo()...log("Could not emit closed endpoint state. Non-serial access. Retrying.");
return true;
}
return false;
});
// Reactor's InternalManySink.emitNext
for (;;) {
Sinks.EmitResult emitResult = tryEmitNext(value);
if (emitResult.isSuccess()) {
return;
}
if (failureHandler.onEmitFailure(SignalType.ON_NEXT, emitResult)) {
continue;
}
// ...
}
// ReactorConnection.closeAsync — caller runs closeConnectionWork when the dispatcher rejects the schedule
if (dispatcher != null) {
try {
dispatcher.invoke(() -> closeConnectionWork());
} catch (IOException | RejectedExecutionException e) {
closeConnectionWork(); // synchronized, calls handler.close()
}
}
ReactorDispatcher.signalWorkQueue is what raises the error that enters onConnectionError. A ClosedChannelException on the proton IO pipe, before the reactor is marked closed, becomes:
connectionId[...] IO Sink was interrupted before reactor closed.
Timeline from client logs. Host name omitted. t0 is the first failed abandon().
| Time | Thread | Log |
|---|---|---|
| t0 | application threads blocked in abandon() |
ReactiveException / InterruptedException from Mono.block at ServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon |
| t0 + 35 ms | those threads | ReactorDispatcher instance is closed for connection MF_f318b1, then onConnectionError, Starting new reactor: IO Sink was interrupted before reactor closed. isTransient=false, isInitiatedByClient=false. onConnectionRemoteClose for this connection has no AMQP error condition |
| t0 + 579 ms | reactor-executor-3 |
onConnectionRemoteOpen for the replacement connection MF_b63740 |
| t0 + 624 ms | application thread | Same IO Sink was interrupted onConnectionError for MF_b63740, then Could not schedule closeConnection work. Manually disposing. |
| t0 + 626 ms onward | that application thread | Could not emit closed endpoint state. Non-serial access. Retrying., signalType=onNext, emitResult=FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED, until process restart |
reactor-executor-3 is still inside the onConnectionRemoteOpen emit when close() emits CLOSED. tryEmitNext returns FAIL_NON_SERIALIZED. The handler returns true, so emitNext spins, still inside synchronized closeConnectionWork(). The reactor thread cannot leave its own emit, because a downstream subscriber is blocked on that same monitor in getOrCreateConnection().
No log in the window matched amqp:connection:forced, a link detach error, a timeout, or a transport error condition.
Expected behavior
Handler.close() should stop retrying. A failed CLOSED emit should not hold the ReactorConnection monitor or pin a reactor thread. Connection recovery should be able to finish, and abandon() / complete() should complete or fail instead of livelocking.
Setup (please complete the following information):
- OS: Linux
- Library/Libraries:
com.azure:azure-messaging-servicebus:7.17.17, which pullscom.azure:azure-core-amqp:2.11.3.reactor-core3.7.x (InternalManySink.emitNextstill busy-loops when the handler returnstrue) - Java version: HotSpot, JDK 15+ lambda frame form (
$$Lambda/0x...) - Frameworks: none.
ServiceBusProcessorClient, blockingabandon()/complete()from an application executor - Also checked:
azure-messaging-servicebus7.18.1 /azure-core-amqp2.12.2, and current main.Handler.close,ReactorConnection.closeConnectionWork, andgetOrCreateConnectionare unchanged. 7.18.1 still calls.block()fromServiceBusReceivedMessageContext.abandon()andcomplete()
Information Checklist
- Bug Description Added
- Repro Steps Added
- Setup information Added
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 2.6k
- Forks
- 2.2k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 22 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 220
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Azure/azure-sdk-for-java
-
mgmt, in track 1 migration guide, call out that file-based authentication method is not recommendedQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. AbiertoAzure.Identity
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#48894 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
needs-triage
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50905 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Design] Support External Evaluation Policy (Invoke) in management SDKsPosiblemente ocupada @weidongxu-microsoft la tomó hace 6 días. Abierto
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50818 · 2 reacciones · 2 asignados ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[FEATURE REQ] ChangeFeedProcessor event handler fully reactive implementationPosiblemente ocupada @FabianMeiswinkel la tomó hace 8 días. AbiertoClient Cosmos customer-reported feature-request needs-team-attention Service Attention
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 12/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50758 · 3 comentarios · 1 reacción · 2 asignados ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
azure-sdk-bom
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 15/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#50754 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Azure/azure-sdk-for-java
Issues similares
-
enhancement feature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
rsp777/service-pulse-app#28 ·
-
human-required sync-failed
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Azure/osdu-spi-file#63 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area/ysql kind/enhancement priority/medium status/awaiting-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
yugabyte/yugabyte-db#35578 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
frontend quick win
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
CodeForPhilly/benefit-decision-toolkit#571 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
approved
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
checkstyle/checkstyle#22129 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día