Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Clarify the meaning of "dynamic" for bindings

未关闭
#213 1 条评论 2 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 类型
文档
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
c, cpp, python
领域
documentation

调研方向

首先定位“Feature Matrix: Bindings”表以及 issue 中引用的教程或 binding 文档。确认其中如何描述 C、C++、C dynamic 和 C++ Dynamic bindings,然后明确 linking 类型和隐式 dynamic 行为。当首次使用的用户仅凭文档就能区分静态加载和动态加载时,即可完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Just my experiences as a first time user of this library while I'm digging through the library itself, the tutorial, etc:

Currently, it is not obvious what the difference between C++ and C++ Dynamic bindings is (Same for C and C dynamic).
My first idea was that it could be related to the internal usage of dynamic_cast or something like that, but it seems like this is not the case.

Am I correct assuming that dynamic refers to the way the library is loaded (dynamically or statically linked)? The C++ dynamic bindings will have all the dlsym bits in it, whereas the normal C++ binding assumes static linking?

If that is correct, I propose the following changes:

  • Add a new Linking type column in the Feature Matrix: Bindings table that (either dynamic or static)
  • Clarify that most of the bindings are implicitly dynamic - I think it's a bit confusing that C and C++ have variants without the suffix (static linking) and with the dynamic suffix (dynamic linking), whereas the other language like Python or Pascal are just implicitly dynamic without the suffix.

If you're not using the library for the first time this may seem obvious, however to me as a first time library user it was not.

主要语言
Go
星标
54
派生
26
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

Autodesk/AutomaticComponentToolkit 的其他 Issue

查看 Autodesk/AutomaticComponentToolkit 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。