Hacktoberfest 2026：维护者为十月标记出来的 issue，仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

GenericTensor 2.0

未关闭
  • 哪里不对？
#27 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
csharp
领域
data, performance

调研方向

首先，盘点 issue 中描述的当前大型接口、通用张量类型、稀疏变换以及现有入口点。在解决尚未确定的维度问题之前，比较提议的特定操作接口、dense Tensor 和 TensorView API、加速选项、命名变更以及 ConvolutedMap 操作。完成意味着设计已经确定，并且兼容的 API 方案已经实现，而不是完成一次孤立的单独修改。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Opinions wanted proposal

GenericTensor 2.0: plan

Alright, time for improvement

1 action - 1 interface

Currently we have a large interface which forces the user to implement all its methods. It's not as good as it was thought to be:

  1. You may want not to implement a method, but you can't guess whether some GT's function uses it or not
  2. The interface is not extendable - adding a new method immediately breaks backward comaptibility

Instead, we will have one method in each interface (there will be multiple interfaces - like IAddAction<A, B, C> etc.).

Now we will be able to constrain each function separately, and the tensor itself won't be constrained (the type will have only one type argument - T). It makes all things much more convenient, and it also allows for more advanced API - for example, adding tensors would look like:

Tensor<C> AddElementwise<A, B, C, TAdd>(Tensor<A> a, Tensor<B> b) where TAdd : IAdd<A, B, C>

Non-generic entry point class API

Currently we need to type the typename with its arguments. Instead, there will be a non-generic static class to handle those things: thanks to type inference, we will type less.

No sparse transformation

Currently, there are some transformations, like transposition and slicing, which makes the tensor "sparse" - that is, instead of rewriting elements themselves, they rewrite the meanings of indices. That means, that going over a just created 2D tensor by width and height would be much faster than if we transpose that tensor beforehand.

In new API such a feature will remain in some different more explicit form, for example, TensorView<T>. It behaves similarly to BCL's Span<T>, which is basically a view on some piece of memory. Likewise, TensorView just allows to read/write to a tensor, but is not a tensor itself. Might be useful for some operations, where the user doesn't want to think about the order of axes or size of a tensor. Though not all API will be available for TensorView<T>.

But tensors itself will be strictly linear/dense. Slicing and transposition will produce a new dense tensor.

Hardware acceleration

Now, with dense tensors we can use three types of acceleration:

  1. Multithreading
  2. SIMD (HonkPerf.NET.GenericSIMD)
  3. GPU

Though the third one is questioned, the first two are definitely doable and will require new methods with type constrained to unmanaged. As simple as that.

New project name - GenericTensor.NET. New type name - Tensor.

Alright, this one is questionable. Should we rename to a more "modern" name? It would mean a new "slot" in nuget packages, and hence, not visible by current users (if there are any aside from AngouriMath, hehe).

New operations

We could implement convoluted map for it. Example of convoluted map:
Imagine matrix A

1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9

and then code:

B = A.ConvolutedMap(width: 2, height: 2, step: 1, view: TensorView -> view[0, 0] + view[0, 1] + view[1, 0] + view[1, 1]);

then B is

12 16
24 28

This way we can basically process, reshape, "bend", collapse or add axes anyhow we need. Upscale for instance:

A =
    1 2 3
    4 5 6
    7 8 9

B = A.ConvolutedMap(
    inputWidth: 2,
    inputHeight: 2,
    step: 2,
    outputWidth: 3,
    outputHeight: 3,
    (source: TensorView, destination: TensorView) ->
        destination[0, 0] = source[0, 0]
        destination[0, 2] = source[0, 1]
        destination[2, 0] = source[1, 0]
        destination[2, 2] = source[1, 1]
        destination[0, 1] = (destination[0, 0] + destination[0, 2]) / 2
        destination[1, 0] = (destination[0, 0] + destination[2, 1]) / 2
        etc...
)

Note, that we don't limit to 2d convolution here, though not sure where we could ever need 4D+ convolutions.

Unresolved questions

Should there be single type Tensor or by dimension - Tensor1D, Tensor2D, etc.? If the latter, should there be TensorND or just cover a fixed number of dimensions?

主要语言
C#
星标
52
派生
6
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

ASC-Community/GenericTensor 的其他 Issue

查看 ASC-Community/GenericTensor 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C# Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。