to_dataset: without ORDER BY, coordinates come back in the engine's nondeterministic row order
維護者通常 3 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
研究方向
Start in xarray_sql/ds.py at the pd.unique call that builds coord_arrays, then trace how those coordinates are used by the scatter path. Reproduce with the provided DuckDB GROUP BY query, comparing repeated runs and a result with ORDER BY ... DESC. Done means unordered results have deterministic coordinates while explicitly ordered results retain their order.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
to_dataset builds each dimension's coordinate in the order its values first appear in the result. That keeps an ORDER BY level DESC in the Dataset, which is the intent (see the comment in xarray_sql/ds.py, where pd.unique builds coord_arrays). But without an ORDER BY, SQL leaves the row order unspecified. DuckDB's parallel scans return rows in a different order on each run, so the same query gives Datasets whose coordinates are in different orders, and rarely in the template's order.
Repro
import numpy as np, pandas as pd, xarray as xr, duckdb
import xarray_sql as xql
ds = xr.Dataset(
{"temp": (("time", "lat", "lon"), np.arange(12.0).reshape(3, 2, 2) + 10)},
coords={"time": pd.date_range("2024-01-01", periods=3),
"lat": [10.0, 20.0], "lon": [100.0, 110.0]},
)
con = duckdb.connect()
xql.register(con, "weather", ds)
for _ in range(3):
rel = con.sql("SELECT lat, lon, MAX(temp) AS temp FROM weather GROUP BY lat, lon")
out = xql.to_dataset(rel, template=ds)
print(out.lat.values, out.lon.values)
Output (xarray-sql main, DuckDB 1.5.5):
[20. 10.] [100. 110.]
[10. 20.] [110. 100.]
[20. 10.] [110. 100.]
Labels are right (out.temp.sel(lat=20.0, lon=110.0) is 21.0 on every run), so nothing is wrong cell by cell. But anything positional is affected:
.values;.isel;- plots, which draw the axis in that order;
xr.testing.assert_equalagainst the source;- concatenating results from two runs.
That's surprising for an Xarray user, since Xarray coordinates from a store are almost always monotonic.
Expected
When the result's order says nothing about a dimension, its coordinate should come back in a deterministic order. Two options:
- Follow the template's order for that dimension. The template is usually ascending, and this makes
assert_equalagainst the source work. - Sort ascending when there's no template.
A result whose rows are monotonic along a dimension (an ORDER BY, including DESC) would keep that order, as now.
One way to decide: if each dimension's first-appearance coordinate is monotonic, keep it; otherwise sort it, or reindex it to the template. The scatter path already argsorts, so the cost is in choosing coord_arrays, not in placing values.
Workaround
Add ORDER BY on the dimensions. The Performance guide already recommends it for speed ("Round-trip faster with ORDER BY"), but not for determinism.
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 142
- 分支
- 19
- 平均合併
- 3 天 47 分鐘
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 8
環境準備
- 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 沒有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
xqlsystems/xarray-sql 的其他 Issue
-
dependencies github_actions
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
xqlsystems/xarray-sql#295 ·
維護者通常 3 天內回覆
-
bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
xqlsystems/xarray-sql#288 ·
維護者通常 3 天內回覆
-
documentation ml
難度 1/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 85/100
xqlsystems/xarray-sql#268 ·
維護者通常 3 天內回覆
-
enhancement ml
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 64/100
xqlsystems/xarray-sql#267 · 4 則留言 ·
維護者通常 3 天內回覆
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 74/100
xqlsystems/xarray-sql#243 ·
維護者通常 3 天內回覆
查看 xqlsystems/xarray-sql 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 74/100
strawberry-graphql/strawberry#4794 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
dataforgoodfr/cetolog#21 ·
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 76/100
btclib-org/btclib#2932 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
metrics priority: medium
難度 1/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 86/100
LearningCircuit/local-deep-research#8336 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 80/100