Hacktoberfest 2026：維護者為十月標記出來的 issue，仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Email domains guide says Void preserves foreign MX records, but `domain add` refuses apexes that have MX records

未關閉
  • 哪裡不對？
#509 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
2/5
預估耗時
1-3 小時
新手友好度
58/100
Issue 類型
文件
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
typescript
領域
documentation

研究方向

Read docs/guide/email/domains.md alongside docs/reference/cli/platform-email.md and the MX checks in platform/packages/api/src/email/connection-service.ts. The issue asks maintainers to clarify whether refusal is intended or foreign MX coexistence should work, so first establish that decision before editing. Done means the guide clearly describes the intended behavior and does not imply unsupported registration.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

Summary

The platform section of the email domains guide says Void "preserves foreign MX records" (docs/guide/email/domains.md L19). Read on its own, that suggests registering an apex whose mail is hosted elsewhere (for example Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace) is supported and leaves that mail alone.

The code refuses that case. Registering a custom apex fails when the domain already has MX records:

platform/packages/api/src/email/connection-service.ts L1459-L1474: "already has MX records; use an unused domain apex or a platform shared email address". On a fresh assignment any MX counts, including Cloudflare's own. On an existing assignment, any non-Cloudflare MX counts.

Use case

I operate a self-hosted Void platform serving several brands whose apex domains use Microsoft 365 for mail. I read the sentence as "register the apex, keep your mailboxes, add Void". It took a failed registration to learn that was not the intent.

What the rest of the docs say

Other text already matches the code. The same paragraph tells readers to choose an apex without another mail provider, the own-account section says Void refuses to replace another provider's MX records (L47), and docs/reference/cli/platform-email.md L76 says to use the shared address or another zone when the MX belongs to another provider. So the sentence may mean "Void does not modify them because it refuses the domain". If so, it is easy to misread.

Question

Which behaviour is intended?

  1. Refusal is intended. I can send a docs PR that rewords the sentence, for example to say that registration is refused when the apex has MX records, and that existing catch-alls on a Void-managed apex are left in place.
  2. Coexistence is intended and the refusal is a bug. In that case I would like to understand the intended design before touching code.

There is also a middle path, outbound-only custom domains, where an apex with foreign MX can send through Void while Void manages no inbound. I intend to raise that separately. If you prefer to solve the mismatch there, I can word the docs change to point at it once it lands.

主要語言
TypeScript
星號
402
分支
32
平均合併
11 小時 52 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
88

環境準備

這個專案沒有提供開發容器、Dockerfile 或貢獻指南，環境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步驟見我們的新手貢獻指南。

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

voidzero-dev/void 的其他 Issue

查看 voidzero-dev/void 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。