diff: `-t --tabsize=<huge>` aborts in `do_expand_tabs`
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
研究方向
The bug is in src/utils.rs in the do_expand_tabs function. Start by reading the function to understand how tabsize is used in capacity calculations at lines 20 and 31. Look for where tabsize is parsed from the command line to see if bounds checking is missing. Write a test that reproduces the abort with large tabsize values, then add validation to limit tabsize to a safe maximum or handle allocation failures gracefully.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
--tabsize is parsed into a usize with no upper bound and then used to size an allocation: do_expand_tabs reserves line.len() + ntabs * (tabsize - 1) bytes or every line containing a tab. A large --tabsize makes that request exceed what the allocator can serve and the process aborts with no diff: diagnostic.
$ printf '\tx\n' > a; printf 'y\n' > b
$ diff -t --tabsize=18446744073709551615 a b > /dev/null
Aborted (core dumped)
$ echo $?
134
The threshold is the allocator, not a parse guard — the request scales directly
with the flag:
$ diff -t --tabsize=1000000000 a b # 1e9 -> exit 1, diffs normally
$ diff -t --tabsize=4611686018427387904 a b # 2^62
memory allocation of 4611686018427387905 bytes failed -> exit 134
$ diff -t --tabsize=9223372036854775807 a b # isize::MAX -> exit 134
A tab in the input is required — ntabs == 0 returns early.
Root cause
src/utils.rs:
pub fn do_expand_tabs(line: &[u8], tabsize: usize) -> Vec<u8> {
let tab = b'\t';
let ntabs = line.iter().filter(|c| **c == tab).count();
if ntabs == 0 {
return line.to_vec();
}
let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(line.len() + ntabs * (tabsize - 1)); // :20
let mut offset = 0;
let mut iter = line.split(|c| *c == tab).peekable();
while let Some(chunk) = iter.next() {
...
if iter.peek().is_some() {
result.resize(result.len() + tabsize - offset % tabsize, b' '); // :31
tabsize comes straight from --tabsize and multiplies the tab count. Nothing bounds it at parse time, so the capacity is attacker-chosen and the allocation aborts.
The same function aborts at a second site, src/utils.rs:31. Once the with_capacity at :20 is survived, the per-chunk result.resize(result.len() + tabsize - offset % tabsize, b' ') requests another attacker-sized allocation. Which of the two fires depends on the --tabsize value:
# :20 — capacity overflow (tabsize = 2^63)
$ diffutils diff -t --tabsize=9223372036854775808 a b
thread 'main' panicked at library/alloc/src/raw_vec/mod.rs:...: capacity overflow
$ echo $?
134
# :31 — allocation abort (tabsize = u64::MAX)
$ printf '\tx\n' > a; printf 'y\n' > b
$ diffutils diff -t --tabsize=18446744073709551615 a b
thread 'main' panicked at library/alloc/src/raw_vec/mod.rs:28:5:
$ echo $?
134
- 主要語言
- Rust
- 星號
- 276
- 分支
- 39
- 平均合併
- 4 天 12 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 3
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
uutils/diffutils 的其他 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 85/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
-
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 88/100
-
bug core
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 86/100
-
JIT-compiled number -> Decimal conversion silently overflows instead of raising DECIMAL_OVERFLOW 未關閉fuzz
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 82/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#122114 ·
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 92/100
linebender/vello_svg#90 ·
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 74/100