Define `__SOLID_SERVER_COMPONENTS__` at build time so libraries can drop server-component-only client code
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
- 難度
- 3/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 55/100
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 技術堆疊
- rollup, typescript, vite
- 領域
- build-system
研究方向
Start in the main plugin's config() hook, next to the existing optimizeDeps.rolldownOptions.transform.jsx, and trace how serverFunctions.components and user define values are resolved. Add the constant in both requested define locations and cover the true, false, and user-provided cases; update the RFC 11 integration surface and server-components skill docs. Done when the checklist is covered and plugin tests pass.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
Problem
@solidjs/router ships a client fallback for server-component forms. These forms arrive as URLs in the HTML with no client reference. When no action() handler is installed, the router intercepts POSTs under actionBase and lazily imports its action layer.
Only server-component apps need this, but every router app pays for it. In a minimal router app with no server functions (Vite 8, gzip):
- about 0.85 KB eager (up to 1.4 KB when it's the app's only dynamic import);
- a 16.8 KB lazy chain: the
serverFormschunk (8.6 KB) plus the decode chunk (7.0 KB) and a server chunk (1.2 KB) behind it.
The router's flat build inlines all of it eagerly (about 8 KB).
Proposal
The plugin defines a global constant __SOLID_SERVER_COMPONENTS__. Core owns and documents the name, with the meaning "server components are enabled for this build".
- Value:
truewhenserverFunctions.componentsis truthy (including'external'), otherwisefalse. It must always be defined: if it's left undefined, nothing can be removed. - Set it in both top-level
define(build, and dev source via/@vite/env) andoptimizeDeps.rolldownOptions.transform.define(dev pre-bundled dependencies; the optimizer ignores top-leveldefine). - Respect a user-provided
define[__SOLID_SERVER_COMPONENTS__]. - Applying it to all environments is fine; it's harmless on the server.
Why a define
Whether a check folds away depends on the form:
| Form | Rollup | Rolldown 1.2.6 | esbuild |
|---|---|---|---|
Imported, never-written let flag |
folds | doesn't fold | doesn't fold |
| Literal define | folds | folds | folds |
Cost
Zero for apps. One config entry in the plugin.
Router follow-up
declare const __SOLID_SERVER_COMPONENTS__: boolean | undefined;
if (typeof __SOLID_SERVER_COMPONENTS__ !== "undefined" && __SOLID_SERVER_COMPONENTS__) {
/* intercept */ import("./serverForms.js")...
}
Bundler, solid entry |
today, KB gz eager / lazy | with false |
|---|---|---|
| Rolldown | 18.84 / 16.22 | 17.97 / 0 |
| Rollup | 19.74 / 15.22 | 18.94 / 0 |
| esbuild | 22.62 eager, serverForms lazy |
20.95, serverForms gone |
- With
true, output matches today andserverFormsstays lazy, so server-component apps withoutaction()still don't pay for it eagerly. - In the flat build,
falsesaves about 7–8 KB eager. - The router's own build (tsc + Rollup) keeps the guard; no config change is needed.
- Without the plugin, the fallback is off at runtime and the bytes are the same as today. Server-component setups without the plugin define the constant themselves, as documented in core.
Alternatives considered
configureClientsetup modules: too much wiring through start mode.- A runtime flag in server-functions/frames: doesn't fold under Rolldown or esbuild (measured above).
- The router installing the fallback from
serverRouteComponent/action: leaves a coverage gap, because forms can arrive with neither present. - Asking Rolldown upstream to fold imported constants: out of our control.
Implementation sketch
This goes in the main plugin's config() hook, next to the existing optimizeDeps.rolldownOptions.transform.jsx, using the serverFunctions.components value resolved in solidPlugin().
const SC_KEY = "__SOLID_SERVER_COMPONENTS__";
// inside config():
const scDefine = { [SC_KEY]: userConfig.define?.[SC_KEY] ?? JSON.stringify(serverComponents) };
return {
define: scDefine,
optimizeDeps: {
// ...existing
rolldownOptions: { transform: { jsx: { runtime: "classic" }, define: scDefine }, plugins: [/* existing */] }
}
};
Checklist
- Plugin:
defineplusoptimizeDeps.rolldownOptions.transform.define; respect the user's value. - Core docs: RFC 11 integration surface and the server-components skill (cross-link).
- Router: wrapped guard; vitest
definetrue plus an off-path test; changeset.
- 主要語言
- TypeScript
- 星號
- 522
- 分支
- 72
- 平均合併
- 1 天 8 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 29
環境準備
- 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 沒有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin 的其他 Issue
-
Test environment detection doesn't consider Vitest workspaces可能已有人在做 @carloitaben 於 47 天前認領。 未關閉
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#205 · 1 則留言 · 2 個 reaction ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#390 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 5/5 一週以上 新手友好度 35/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#388 · 1 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#387 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#381 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
查看 solidjs/solid-vite-plugin 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 85/100
lukilabs/beautiful-mermaid#160 ·
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 66/100
rescript-lang/rescript-lang.org#1420 ·
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 82/100
chthollyphile/folia-major#520 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 82/100
databuddy-analytics/Databuddy#1106 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆