Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Consider using computed docstrings

未關閉
#2,443 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
18/100
Issue 類型
重構
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
停滯
技術堆疊
python
領域
documentation

研究方向

The duplicated text lives in the new pvlib.iotools.psm4 functions, so start by comparing their docstrings to see which parts are shared. The thread leaves open whether docstrings are built at import time or at package build, and that choice is a design decision for maintainers. Done would mean one agreed approach, applied to psm4 with rendered docs and tests unchanged.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

documentation

As mentioned by @wholmgren in https://github.com/pvlib/pvlib-python/issues/2326#issuecomment-2685685954, the new pvlib.iotools.psm4 functions have long, very similar docstrings, which may be improved by using computed docstrings:

If we go with the separate functions then I think we should venture into computed docstrings. Computed docstrings are now common in the pydata world but haven't yet been used in pvlib. The module is 800 lines and about half of those are minor permutations of a 100 line docstring - and this will only get worse if we mirror more of the NSRDB API.

Here are some breadcrumbs I found with a brief investigation:

Some additional food for thought: do the docstrings have to be generated at import time (may not work with some IDEs as linked above, plus adds import overhead), or can we find some way to generate them once during package build or installation?

主要語言
Python
星號
1.7k
分支
1.2k
平均合併
3 天 18 小時
30 天內合併 PR
13

環境準備

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

pvlib/pvlib-python 的其他 Issue

查看 pvlib/pvlib-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。