Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Missing `@JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)` on capability sub-records

未關閉
#766 4 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
2/5
預估耗時
1-3 小時
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
停滯
技術堆疊
java
領域
api

研究方向

從 mcp-core/src/main/java/io/modelcontextprotocol/spec/McpSchema.java 開始,檢查列出的 capability record,並將其與 ClientCapabilities 和 ServerCapabilities 進行比較。完成標準是:在反序列化期間,忽略每個受影響的 capability 子記錄中的未知欄位,包括巢狀的 elicitation record。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

bug P1
Bug description

The top-level ClientCapabilities and ServerCapabilities records have @JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true), but their nested sub-records do not. Since the ObjectMapper is constructed with default settings (FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES = true), any unknown field on a capability sub-object causes a deserialization failure.

This already caused a real breakage when the elicitation capability gained form and url fields (#724, fixed in #731), but the systemic issue remains — the next spec addition to any capability sub-object will break older SDK versions again.

Affected records

In McpSchema.java:

Record Line Has annotation?
ClientCapabilities 383 Yes
RootCapabilities 397 Yes
Sampling 410 No
Elicitation 437 No
Elicitation.Form 443 No
Elicitation.Url 450 No
ServerCapabilities 535 Yes
CompletionCapabilities 548 No
LoggingCapabilities 555 No
PromptCapabilities 565 No
ResourceCapabilities 576 No
ToolCapabilities 587 No
Spec reference

The spec schema explicitly states capabilities are not a closed set:

"Known capabilities are defined here, in this schema, but this is not a closed set: any client can define its own, additional capabilities."

ClientCapabilities in schema.json — additionalProperties: false is never set on any capability object or sub-object. Several sub-capabilities (sampling, elicitation, completions, logging) explicitly set additionalProperties: true.

Expected behavior

Unknown fields on capability sub-objects should be silently ignored, matching the behavior of the top-level ClientCapabilities and ServerCapabilities records.

Related
  • #734 — reports the same issue for ToolCapabilities specifically
  • #724 / #731 — the elicitation breakage that was fixed by adding fields, not by adding the annotation

AI Disclaimer

主要語言
Java
星號
3.7k
分支
1.1k
平均合併
1 天 15 小時
30 天內合併 PR
9

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk 的其他 Issue

查看 modelcontextprotocol/java-sdk 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Java Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。