Tracking for V3 Upgrade
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
@ramsessanchez 已經在處理了。
開始於 2026年10月28日。
評估
這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。
描述
Tracking Issue for V3 Upgrades
#3873
V3 upgrade and release-readiness checklist
This checklist covers the full V3 upgrade, not only wrapper generation. Known follow-up identifies existing work or documented gaps; Validation identifies proposed release checks; Decision identifies policy or scope that needs agreement. These are not automatically all release blockers.
For each item, record an owner, linked issue/PR, completion criteria, and evidence. Mark complete only after those criteria are met; an open PR is not completion. Track approved deferrals with a rationale and user impact.
1. Runtime correctness
- Known follow-up: Resolve #3873: make session request-adapter caching Graph-profile-aware. Cover v1.0/beta in either order, interleaved/concurrent requests, same-profile reuse, and reconnect/context/disconnect lifecycle behavior.
- Validation: Verify supported authentication flows, Graph environments/service roots, session reuse, and explicit access-token behavior.
- Validation: Exercise cancellation, retry/throttling behavior, and actionable PowerShell error records.
- Validation: Verify list pagination and delta continuation, including query/header preservation and continuation-link profile/service-root validation.
2. Module and directive migration
- Known follow-up: Complete remaining module migration/audit PRs and record the disposition of every intended module/profile, including modules with no shared directives.
- Known follow-up: Track shared-framework work in #3847 (reviewed legacy operation-ID migration bridges) and #3849 (natural-ID GET parameter-set variants), and validate affected modules after landing.
- Known follow-up: Inventory profile-local directives and global
src/readme.graph.mddirectives, which the current shared-module migration excludes. - Decision: Disposition deferred parameter aliases/transforms and schema/response directives: implement required behavior or explicitly document intentional changes.
- Validation: Reconcile migration ledgers with current specifications; distinguish a missing/excluded profile specification from a reviewed absence of API operations.
3. Command and API compatibility
- Validation: Refresh naming, route, export, parameter-set, and operation-coverage ledgers for both v1.0 and beta; do not rely on historical README counts.
- Decision: Classify differences as regressions, intentional corrections, new APIs, or retired APIs; agree on compatibility-sensitive naming and removed/renamed commands.
- Known follow-up: Review documented unsupported operation/body shapes and cross-path merges; implement or explicitly disposition each relevant release gap.
- Validation: Exercise complex request bodies, collections, enums, polymorphism,
AdditionalProperties, pipeline binding, and response/output shapes with representative scripts.
4. PowerShell user experience
- Known follow-up: Generate per-cmdlet help and examples; verify
Get-Help,Get-Command, parameter discovery, and example execution against V3. - Known follow-up: Audit destructive commands for
SupportsShouldProcessand verify-WhatIf/-Confirmbehavior. - Validation: Review output formatting/type information and script ergonomics rather than assuming V2 artifacts remain valid.
5. Platform support and quality gates
- Decision: Declare supported PowerShell versions, operating systems, and architectures.
- Known follow-up: Close the documented automated Windows PowerShell 5.1 gate gap if 5.1 remains supported; otherwise document and approve the support change.
- Validation: Run generator, migration, compiled-route/parity, body-omission, build/import, and runtime gates for the intended release surface.
- Validation: Run representative end-to-end scenarios across the supported matrix; distinguish stub-transport coverage from live-service validation.
6. Packaging and distribution
- Validation: Verify clean-machine install/import for individual modules and the aggregate distribution, including module names and dependency resolution.
- Validation: Verify runtime/Authentication/Kiota dependency loading and supported V2/V3, v1.0/beta, and adjacent-module coexistence scenarios.
- Validation: Verify manifests, exports, versions, signing, prerelease promotion, public publishing, and install/update/uninstall behavior. Existing internal-feed infrastructure alone does not establish public-release readiness.
- Validation: Confirm reproducible generation and release validation using pinned specification/tool inputs.
7. Performance and reliability
- Decision: Define acceptance budgets for installation/import, memory, first-command latency, large listings, and representative bulk operations.
- Validation: Compare against a declared V2 baseline and investigate material regressions.
- Validation: Exercise repeated connections, long-lived sessions, mixed profiles, and parallel activity for lifecycle/resource regressions.
8. Upgrade guidance and release decision
- Validation: Publish the V2-to-V3 upgrade guide: prerequisites, breaking changes, command/parameter mappings, request/response model changes, installation, and rollback.
- Validation: Publish known limitations and the user-visible impact/disposition of deferred work.
- Decision: Define preview/GA exit criteria, distinguish release blockers from approved deferrals, and record release sign-off with evidence.
Documentation migration and V2-to-V3 transition
- Validation: Inventory conceptual guides, cmdlet reference/help, API-reference snippets, samples, installation pages, and contributor/generation docs; assign owners and a V3 migration disposition.
- Decision: Define documentation versioning/navigation and V2/V3 coexistence; label preview versus GA and retain guidance for supported V2 users.
- Validation: Migrate cmdlet reference/help generation to the V3 surface; verify syntax, parameter sets, parameter types, return values, examples, and links against generated modules.
- Validation: Verify command metadata, API-reference snippet generation, and SDK example-import workflows consume the intended V3 inputs; regenerate and execute representative v1.0 and beta examples.
- Validation: Publish task-based before/after examples and command/parameter/type mappings, including intentionally removed or renamed APIs and behavior changes.
- Validation: Document clean upgrade, supported side-by-side installation, script/module version pinning, authentication/dependency considerations, and rollback to V2.
- Validation: Check inbound links, redirects, search/navigation, version selectors, and deprecation banners so users reach documentation for the correct SDK version.
- Decision: Define V2 maintenance/support policy and transition communications, including any deprecation timelines.
- Validation: Obtain documentation and migration-guide sign-off before V3 release.
- 主要語言
- C#
- 星號
- 904
- 分支
- 235
- 平均合併
- 1 天 21 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 18
環境準備
- 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-powershell 的其他 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 84/100
microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-powershell#3752 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
status:waiting-for-triage type:bug
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-powershell#3873 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
status:waiting-for-triage type:bug
難度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 57/100
microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-powershell#3872 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
status:waiting-for-triage type:bug
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 55/100
microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-powershell#3831 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
status:waiting-for-triage type:feature
難度 5/5 一週以上 新手友好度 8/100
microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-powershell#3827 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
查看 microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-powershell 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
bug 優先: 低
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 76/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 92/100
-
.NET area: storage bug good first issue
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
Larson-Logan/medal-sync#61 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 88/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆