Java: `java/xxe` doesn't cover public XML helper methods that parse caller-provided input
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
研究方向
從 java/xxe 查詢及其現有的解析器建構 sink 和安全設定建模開始。檢查對將 InputStream、String、Reader 或 URL 值傳遞給 DocumentBuilderFactory.parse 的公開 helper 的涵蓋情況,然後與類似的 SAXParserFactory 和 XMLInputFactory 入口進行比較。完成標準是:測試能夠展示對所述 helper 形態和簡單 wrapper 的 findings,同時不遺失現有結果。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
This looks like a gap in java/xxe around library-style XML helpers. If a public helper takes caller-provided XML as an InputStream, String, Reader, or URL, builds a DocumentBuilderFactory without XXE hardening, and then calls newDocumentBuilder().parse(...), I wouldn't expect that to fall out of coverage.
CodeQL already seems to model the parser sink and the usual safe configs here, and it still finds other java/xxe results in the same codebase, so this doesn't look like a missing sink or a failed analysis. It looks more like these public parsing entry points are not treated as strong enough sources for this query. That's a pretty normal pattern in SDK helpers, XML utility classes, metadata loaders, and config parsers, where the trust boundary is the method parameter rather than a controller or request object.
The aws-sdk-android fix for CVE-2022-4725 is a good example: both RegionMetadataParser.parse(InputStream) and XpathUtils.documentFrom(...) were fixed by adding the standard DocumentBuilderFactory hardening.
Semgrep's documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-missing rule catches the same shape by reusing the existing parser-construction sink and checking for missing hardening, which makes this seem like a fairly local modeling issue.
My guess is that java/xxe could cover this by recognizing public parse helpers that feed caller-controlled XML directly, or through trivial wrappers, into the existing XXE sinks. I would expect the same hole to show up for similar helper methods built around SAXParserFactory and XMLInputFactory too.
import java.io.InputStream;
import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory;
class XmlHelper {
public static void parse(InputStream in) throws Exception {
DocumentBuilderFactory f = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
var b = f.newDocumentBuilder();
b.parse(in);
}
}
- 主要語言
- CodeQL
- 星號
- 10.1k
- 分支
- 2.1k
- 平均合併
- 2 天 16 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 143
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
github/codeql 的其他 Issue
-
agentic-workflows
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 84/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 82/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
-
false-positive
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
相似的 Issue
-
needs-triage
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
-
Nmap
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 85/100
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
-
blocklist removal
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 65/100
MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect#296544 ·
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
Azure/azure-functions-docker#1257 ·