Java SSRF Findings
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
研究方向
從 Java Controller 和 Service Layer 程式碼片段開始,追蹤輸入從路徑變數經過 URI 建構到 RestTemplate.exchange() sink 的過程。檢查相關的 CodeQL SSRF 分析如何處理允許清單中的基礎 URL 和 URI 驗證;完成的標準是確定這是一個可重現的 query 誤報,還是找出 triage 所需的缺失證據。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
Hi Team,
Hope you're doing well!
Just adding this here as a question to check if anyone has any inputs or recommendations.
Description of issue
CWE-918 (SSRF) finding alert when input parameters are eventually appended to a URL used to make outbound calls to external systems in the source code.
However, the implementation includes multiple layers of mitigation, which I believe should prevent SSRF:
- The input string is validated via regex (alphanumeric + length check).
- A sanitization method strips any non-alphanumeric characters.-
- The base URL is sourced from a secure Spring Boot config (application.properties) using the @Value annotation.
- I’ve implemented an allow-list validation, ensuring the final URI starts with one of the expected base URLs.
- Despite these controls, CodeQL still flags the usage as SSRF in the RestTemplate.exchange() call.
Please refer to the code snippet below for reference:
Code samples or links to source code
Controller(source)
@RequestMapping(path = "{inputKey:^[a-zA-Z0-9]{8}$|^[a-zA-Z0-9]{10}$}", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
@ApiResponses({ @ApiResponse(responseCode = "404", description = "Resource Not Found"),
@ApiResponse(responseCode = "200", description = "OK") })
public ResourceResponse getURLsByIdentifier(
@Parameter(description = "Enter inputKey.", name = "inputKey", required = true) @PathVariable("inputKey") String inputKey) {
### Source inputKey
return resourceService.getResourceUrls(sanitizeAlphanumeric(inputKey));
}
private String sanitizeAlphanumeric(String input) {
if (input == null) return "";
return input.replaceAll("[^a-zA-Z0-9]", "");
}
Service Layer (Sink)
//validated URL is being formed
URI configURI = UriComponentsBuilder.
fromUriString(baseUrl) //baseURl is pickup from Spring config using @Value annotation
.path(inputKey) // pased from controller
.queryParam("config", "true")
.build()
.toUri();
HttpEntity<String> entity = new HttpEntity<>(getHeaders());
### Sink configURI
ResponseEntity<Map<String, Object>> response = restTemplate.exchange(configURI, HttpMethod.GET, entity,
new ParameterizedTypeReference<>() {}); // Vunerbility reported here
//have implemented a URL validation mechanism by maintaining a map of all allowed base URLs and verifying
// whether the constructed configURI starts with one of the expected base URLs. However, this approach also did not help resolve the issue.
I’ve also verified that:
baseUrl is always from a known set of safe endpoints.
A custom check ensures the final URI starts with one of the allow-listed base URLs before making the request.
Appreciate any insights or suggestions. Happy to share more details if needed. Thanks in advance!
- 主要語言
- CodeQL
- 星號
- 10.1k
- 分支
- 2.1k
- 平均合併
- 2 天 16 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 143
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
github/codeql 的其他 Issue
-
agentic-workflows
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 84/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 82/100
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
-
false-positive
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
docToolchain/docToolchain#1705 ·
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk#3566 ·
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability status: needs triage 🕵️♀️
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
carbon-design-system/ibm-products#9907 ·
-
agent/security hive/hosted-available-lke648397-260827-5n31 security
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
-
enhancement
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 則留言 ·