Misleading comments and small redundancies in the core path

未關閉 適合新手
  • 哪裡不對？
#329 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
2/5
預估耗時
半天
新手友好度
75/100
Issue 類型
重構
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
go
領域
cli, networking

研究方向

從引用的七行開始：internal/output/writer.go 和 internal/tui/model.go 中過時的 JSON 註解，internal/dns/resolver.go 中的 resolveWithLog 日誌呼叫，main_session.go 與 main.go 之間重複的 validateArgs 呼叫，以及 tuiOptions 中的兩條 fmt.Fprintf 警告。完成的標準是：註解描述的是串流輸出，對於 NODATA 結果 -v 不再印出 Error: <nil>，重複的驗證已移除，TUI 警告改為透過 diag 輸出。使用 -simulate 或本地測試伺服器，透過 make test 進行驗證，不要使用真實網域。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

good first issue severity: low tech-debt

Summary

A checklist of small items: three comments that still say JSON output is buffered, a verbose log line that labels a definitive negative as a failure with Error: <nil>, a validation call that runs twice, and two TUI warnings that bypass the diagnostics writer.

Where

  • internal/output/writer.go:28
  • internal/tui/model.go:329
  • internal/tui/model.go:346
  • internal/dns/resolver.go:479
  • main_session.go:288
  • main.go:304
  • main_session.go:230

Details

Checklist, each item read at the cited line:

  • writer.go:28: "FormatJSON buffers results and emits a single JSON array at completion". Since #181 it streams each element (writeJSONElement, writer.go:255-284); the comment on Emit at 175-178 says so correctly.
  • tui/model.go:329-330 and 346-347: "finalize structured output so buffered JSON/CSV is written" and "buffered JSON array emitted": same stale description of JSON.
  • resolver.go:478-479: l.Logf("Failed to resolve: %s (Error: %v) in %s", domain, err, elapsed) also runs when the lookup succeeded with no records of the requested types (err == nil, the NODATA case Resolve handles at 500-505), so -v prints Failed to resolve: x (Error: <nil>) for a definitive negative.
  • main_session.go:288 calls validateArgs, and validateFlags (called at 318) calls it again as its first statement (main.go:304). The second call can never fail.
  • main_session.go:230 and 240: tuiOptions writes its two warnings straight to stderr with fmt.Fprintf, bypassing the diag writer built ten lines earlier (main_session.go:162), so -tui -log-format json emits plain text lines among JSON ones.

Impact

Readers are told JSON output is held in memory when it is not (relevant to anyone reasoning about memory or partial output), verbose logs label negatives as failures, and two small inconsistencies add noise. None changes results.

Suggested fix

Reword the three comments to "streamed as array elements; Finish closes the array". In resolveWithLog, branch on err == nil and log "No records: %s (%s) in %s". Drop the validateArgs call from validateFlags or from configure. Route the two TUI warnings through diag.Notice.

Acceptance criteria

  • Each checklist item under Details is fixed
  • -v no longer prints Error: <nil>

Getting started

  • Relevant files: internal/output/writer.go, internal/tui/model.go, internal/dns/resolver.go, main_session.go
  • How to run tests: make test (or go test ./...). Tests must stay hermetic: use -simulate, -simulate-zone or the local DNS test server, never a live domain.
  • Related docs: docs/DEVELOPER_GUIDE.md, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md

Filed by repo-audit/full-audit at d0c56f0. Severity: low. Effort: S. audit-key: tech-debt|internal/output/writer.go|comments

主要語言
Go
星號
1
分支
1
平均合併
6 小時 42 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
7

環境準備

在 Codespaces 中開啟

在瀏覽器裡用你自己的 GitHub 帳號啟動這個專案的開發容器。

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

TMHSDigital/subenum 的其他 Issue

查看 TMHSDigital/subenum 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。