Feature: strengthen multi-agent orchestration as the backbone of Lights-Out Factory
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
@wsp1911 已經在處理了。
開始於 2026年10月19日。
評估
這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。
描述
Context - OpenBitFun already ships multi-agent foundations: the Ultimate Agent Harness mode (divide the work among agents, bring their results together), the agent-teams topic, and DeepSWE v1.1 results (GLM-5.3-Flash 64.6%, DeepSeek-V4-Flash 56.6%). But the public roadmap (Where we're headed: Lights-Out Factory / Infinite Radius / App Evolution) does not list multi-agent orchestration as an explicit pillar - even though Lights-Out Factory (plan by day, tasks continue on a server, review the results next morning) structurally depends on it.
Proposal - elevate multi-agent orchestration into a first-class capability powering Lights-Out Factory:
- Role-based pipeline (Ultimate mode) - split each task into roles with generation/verification separation:
- Planner: spec / ground-truth / acceptance criteria.
- Implementer: writes in an isolated worktree.
- Reviewer: adversarial review with a different model + separate context.
- Verifier: runs the checks in a clean environment.
- Verifiable gates - machine-decodable acceptance (ground-truth / parity / byte-level diff) so merges are judged by objective checks, not human review alone.
- Orchestrator - schedules, monitors, merges; does not write artifacts itself.
- Reusable workflows - expose the pipeline as a composable, reusable template (factory of workflows).
Why now - Lights-Out Factory needs long-running, fault-isolated, multi-agent execution on a server. Strengthening orchestration now de-risks that roadmap item and makes Ultimate genuinely competitive with the role-based pipelines emerging in open-source agents.
Guardrail - keep BYO-model / local / private posture. Take the methodology (process architecture + generation/verification separation), not a closed vendor ecosystem (no binding to any single inference endpoint or cloud swarm).
Happy to break this into concrete milestones (persistent daemon + session isolation first, then role pipeline + gates). Would maintainers consider this direction?
- 主要語言
- Rust
- 星號
- 2.3k
- 分支
- 236
- 平均合併
- 7 小時 47 分鐘
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 236
環境準備
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
GCWing/OpenBitFun 的其他 Issue
-
[Feature]: 模型服务表单缺少「图像生成」分类入口 —— 后端已支持 default_models.image_generation可能已有人在做 @skyfireitdiy 於 7 天前認領。 未關閉
難度 2/5 半天 新手友好度 74/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#3279 · 1 個 reaction ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#2363 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
question
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 78/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#2340 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 5/5 一週以上 新手友好度 35/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#3537 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 45/100
GCWing/OpenBitFun#3530 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
查看 GCWing/OpenBitFun 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
feature
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 92/100
dsx-ai-factory/infra-controller#8145 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
bug: workspace access hint suggests a --subject command that fails for hyphen-leading OIDC subjects未關閉
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
type: bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
A-FFI C-Testing D-Straightforward S-Ready
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆