[Feature request]: parameterized computed fields — accept arguments in orderBy/where/select
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- sql, typescript
Research direction
The payload points at ComputedFieldsOptions (already typed (eb, ...args) => OperandExpression) and at @computed in ZModel, with orderBy/where/select as the three consumption sites. Start by finding that type and the ZModel parser/schema handling of @computed, then trace how a computed field is lowered into the Kysely query for ordering. Done means args are declared in ZModel, validated (zod, like custom procedures), serialized from the client, and accepted in all three query slots with access policies intact. Note the open named-vs-positional decision must be settled first.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Feature request: let @computed fields take arguments (so you can sort/filter by a parameterized SQL value)
What I want
Today a @computed field is a fixed SQL expression. I'd like a computed field to accept
arguments, and to pass those arguments (as plain data) when I use the field in orderBy,
where, or select.
Because the arguments are plain data, they serialize fine (JSON / superjson). So a frontend can
drive the sort/filter through the auto-generated CRUD API — no custom endpoint, no raw SQL — and
it all stays in one query with access policies and result types intact.
The problem (concrete)
A product list shows one column per "tag category". Clicking a column header should sort products by
the name of their tag in that category — e.g. string_agg(tag.name) where tag.category_id = 5.
The category id is chosen by the user at runtime.
I can't express this today:
- Computed fields can be used in
orderBy, but they take no arguments — so the runtime
categoryIdcan't get in. (Categories are user data, so "one computed field per category" isn't an
option.) $qb/ raw SQL can do it, but bypass access policies and lose the typed result.- A plugin (
onKyselyQuery) can do it, but it doesn't receive the ORM arguments, so the
categoryIdhas to be smuggled in viaAsyncLocalStorage+ hand-written SQL-AST editing.
Every workaround gives up the "one policy-checked, typed query" that the ORM is for.
Proposal
Allow a computed field to declare arguments, and pass them where the field is used.
Small example — sort users by how many posts they made since a date:
model User {
id Int @id
posts Post[]
// a computed field that takes an argument
recentPostCount(since: DateTime): Int @computed
}
// implementation, written once at client construction
computedFields: {
User: {
recentPostCount: (eb, { since }) =>
eb.selectFrom('Post')
.whereRef('Post.authorId', '=', eb.ref('User.id'))
.where('Post.createdAt', '>=', since)
.select(({ fn }) => fn.countAll<number>().as('v')),
},
},
// usage — `args` is plain data, so this whole object can come from a client
await db.user.findMany({
orderBy: { recentPostCount: { args: { since: '2024-01-01' }, sort: 'desc' } },
take: 20,
});
The real use case — sort products by their tag name in a chosen category:
model ProductSite {
id Int @id
tags ProductTag[]
tagNameInCategory(categoryId: Int): String? @computed
}
computedFields: {
ProductSite: {
tagNameInCategory: (eb, { categoryId }) =>
eb.selectFrom('tag')
.innerJoin('product_tag', 'product_tag.tag_id', 'tag.id')
.whereRef('product_tag.product_site_id', '=', eb.ref('ProductSite.id'))
.where('tag.category_id', '=', categoryId)
.select(sql<string>`string_agg(tag.name, ', ' order by tag.name)`.as('v')),
},
},
// one query, sorted in the DB, policies applied, result still typed
await db.productSite.findMany({
where: { siteId: { in: allowedSiteIds } },
orderBy: [
{ tagNameInCategory: { args: { categoryId: 5 }, sort: 'asc', nulls: 'last' } },
{ id: 'asc' }, // tiebreaker — composes with normal ordering
],
select: { id: true, name: true },
take: 25,
});
The same field (with args) would work in where and select too, since computed fields already
work in all three places:
await db.productSite.findMany({
where: { tagNameInCategory: { args: { categoryId: 5 }, not: null } },
select: { id: true, tagNameInCategory: { args: { categoryId: 5 } } },
});
Why this shape
- It builds on computed fields, which already evaluate in SQL and already work in
orderBy/where/select. The only new part is "they can take arguments." - The arguments are plain data, so they serialize and can be sent from a client (unlike a
function-based escape hatch — see alternatives). - The implementation type already looks ready for it:
ComputedFieldsOptionsis
(eb, ...args) => OperandExpression, i.e. it already allows extra arguments. The missing pieces
are the ZModel syntax for declaring the args and the query syntax for passing them.
Alternatives considered
orderBy.$expr— a Kysely-expression escape hatch inorderBy, mirroring the existing
where.$expr. Good for server-built queries and nice for consistency, but$expris a
function, so it can't be serialized / sent from a client (the same reasonwhere.$expris
server-only). It doesn't solve the frontend case. Still worth having as a server-side companion.- Filtered relation-aggregate
orderBy, e.g.
orderBy: { tags: { where: { categoryId: 5 }, _min: { name: 'asc' } } }— fully serializable and
simpler, but limited to_min/_max/_count, so "sort by the tag names" becomes "sort by the
min/max tag name". A good lightweight option, but less general than parameterized computed fields.
Notes for maintainers
- Open question: named vs positional args. The current
ComputedFieldsOptionstype uses
positional...args; the examples above use named ({ categoryId }) for readability. Either works. - Args should be validated (e.g. a zod schema from the ZModel arg types), like custom procedures
already validate their args. - Access policy: the computed field runs inside the main query, so the policy plugin still filters
the queried model. The subquery's referenced tables aren't policy-checked — same as today's
computed fields and$qb.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 157
- Avg merge
- 11h 42m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 20
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from zenstackhq/zenstack
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2873 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
runtime
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2868 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2694 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2659 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2542 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in zenstackhq/zenstack
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
cline/mcp-marketplace#2932 ·
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 82/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#32188 · 1 comment · 5 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Portkey-AI/gateway#1844 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
needs triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 61/100
rjsf-team/react-jsonschema-form#5495 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days