[Feature request]: parameterized computed fields — accept arguments in orderBy/where/select
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 15/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Tranquilla
- Stack tecnologico
- sql, typescript
Direzione di ricerca
The payload points at ComputedFieldsOptions (already typed (eb, ...args) => OperandExpression) and at @computed in ZModel, with orderBy/where/select as the three consumption sites. Start by finding that type and the ZModel parser/schema handling of @computed, then trace how a computed field is lowered into the Kysely query for ordering. Done means args are declared in ZModel, validated (zod, like custom procedures), serialized from the client, and accepted in all three query slots with access policies intact. Note the open named-vs-positional decision must be settled first.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Feature request: let @computed fields take arguments (so you can sort/filter by a parameterized SQL value)
What I want
Today a @computed field is a fixed SQL expression. I'd like a computed field to accept
arguments, and to pass those arguments (as plain data) when I use the field in orderBy,
where, or select.
Because the arguments are plain data, they serialize fine (JSON / superjson). So a frontend can
drive the sort/filter through the auto-generated CRUD API — no custom endpoint, no raw SQL — and
it all stays in one query with access policies and result types intact.
The problem (concrete)
A product list shows one column per "tag category". Clicking a column header should sort products by
the name of their tag in that category — e.g. string_agg(tag.name) where tag.category_id = 5.
The category id is chosen by the user at runtime.
I can't express this today:
- Computed fields can be used in
orderBy, but they take no arguments — so the runtime
categoryIdcan't get in. (Categories are user data, so "one computed field per category" isn't an
option.) $qb/ raw SQL can do it, but bypass access policies and lose the typed result.- A plugin (
onKyselyQuery) can do it, but it doesn't receive the ORM arguments, so the
categoryIdhas to be smuggled in viaAsyncLocalStorage+ hand-written SQL-AST editing.
Every workaround gives up the "one policy-checked, typed query" that the ORM is for.
Proposal
Allow a computed field to declare arguments, and pass them where the field is used.
Small example — sort users by how many posts they made since a date:
model User {
id Int @id
posts Post[]
// a computed field that takes an argument
recentPostCount(since: DateTime): Int @computed
}
// implementation, written once at client construction
computedFields: {
User: {
recentPostCount: (eb, { since }) =>
eb.selectFrom('Post')
.whereRef('Post.authorId', '=', eb.ref('User.id'))
.where('Post.createdAt', '>=', since)
.select(({ fn }) => fn.countAll<number>().as('v')),
},
},
// usage — `args` is plain data, so this whole object can come from a client
await db.user.findMany({
orderBy: { recentPostCount: { args: { since: '2024-01-01' }, sort: 'desc' } },
take: 20,
});
The real use case — sort products by their tag name in a chosen category:
model ProductSite {
id Int @id
tags ProductTag[]
tagNameInCategory(categoryId: Int): String? @computed
}
computedFields: {
ProductSite: {
tagNameInCategory: (eb, { categoryId }) =>
eb.selectFrom('tag')
.innerJoin('product_tag', 'product_tag.tag_id', 'tag.id')
.whereRef('product_tag.product_site_id', '=', eb.ref('ProductSite.id'))
.where('tag.category_id', '=', categoryId)
.select(sql<string>`string_agg(tag.name, ', ' order by tag.name)`.as('v')),
},
},
// one query, sorted in the DB, policies applied, result still typed
await db.productSite.findMany({
where: { siteId: { in: allowedSiteIds } },
orderBy: [
{ tagNameInCategory: { args: { categoryId: 5 }, sort: 'asc', nulls: 'last' } },
{ id: 'asc' }, // tiebreaker — composes with normal ordering
],
select: { id: true, name: true },
take: 25,
});
The same field (with args) would work in where and select too, since computed fields already
work in all three places:
await db.productSite.findMany({
where: { tagNameInCategory: { args: { categoryId: 5 }, not: null } },
select: { id: true, tagNameInCategory: { args: { categoryId: 5 } } },
});
Why this shape
- It builds on computed fields, which already evaluate in SQL and already work in
orderBy/where/select. The only new part is "they can take arguments." - The arguments are plain data, so they serialize and can be sent from a client (unlike a
function-based escape hatch — see alternatives). - The implementation type already looks ready for it:
ComputedFieldsOptionsis
(eb, ...args) => OperandExpression, i.e. it already allows extra arguments. The missing pieces
are the ZModel syntax for declaring the args and the query syntax for passing them.
Alternatives considered
orderBy.$expr— a Kysely-expression escape hatch inorderBy, mirroring the existing
where.$expr. Good for server-built queries and nice for consistency, but$expris a
function, so it can't be serialized / sent from a client (the same reasonwhere.$expris
server-only). It doesn't solve the frontend case. Still worth having as a server-side companion.- Filtered relation-aggregate
orderBy, e.g.
orderBy: { tags: { where: { categoryId: 5 }, _min: { name: 'asc' } } }— fully serializable and
simpler, but limited to_min/_max/_count, so "sort by the tag names" becomes "sort by the
min/max tag name". A good lightweight option, but less general than parameterized computed fields.
Notes for maintainers
- Open question: named vs positional args. The current
ComputedFieldsOptionstype uses
positional...args; the examples above use named ({ categoryId }) for readability. Either works. - Args should be validated (e.g. a zod schema from the ZModel arg types), like custom procedures
already validate their args. - Access policy: the computed field runs inside the main query, so the policy plugin still filters
the queried model. The subquery's referenced tables aren't policy-checked — same as today's
computed fields and$qb.
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 2.9k
- Fork
- 157
- Merge medio
- 11h 42m
- PR unite (30g)
- 20
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di zenstackhq/zenstack
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2873 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
runtime
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2868 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2694 · 3 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 68/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2659 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2542 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di zenstackhq/zenstack
Issue simili
-
Mondriaan
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 88/100
knaw-huc/textannoviz#709 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Add: YRF Music NepalApertastreams:add
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 62/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
walletbeat/walletbeat#1558 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
hawk-digital-environments/HAWKI#438 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
OktoLabsAI/okto-pulse#114 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno