Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

[workshop-sim] Workshop Simulation Report — 2026-10-25 (Run #106000, 1000×Monte Carlo)

Đã đóng
  • Có gì không ổn?
#4,974 0 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Maintainer thường phản hồi trong vòng 1 ngày

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

Đánh giá

Độ khó
4/5
Thời gian dự kiến
3-5 ngày
Mức phù hợp với người mới
45/100
Loại issue
Tài liệu
Độ rõ ràng
Cần làm rõ
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Công nghệ
github-actions, markdown
Lĩnh vực
documentation

Hướng nghiên cứu

Read the step files cited in the report (04-github-actions-intro.md, 05-agentic-workflows-intro.md, 07-your-first-workflow.md) and the template that sets copilot-requests: write. First map the reported drop-off causes to the page content, then apply the listed repairs. Done means the billing contradiction is merged and Steps 04–05 gain hands-on practice with verifiable checkpoints.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Mô tả

feedback simulation workshop
Overview
  • Date: 2026-10-25
  • Students simulated: 46 × 1000 Monte Carlo runs
  • Workshop steps available: 31/31
  • Overall success rate: 22.3% (95% Monte Carlo interval: 21.9%–22.6%)
  • Highest-dropout step: 07-first-workflow (26.6% conditional dropout among 22,399 at-risk runs; 95% interval: 26.1%–27.2%). Part 1.
  • Lowest curriculum quality step: 04-github-actions-intro.md (overall score 5.4/10)
  • Learning KPI index: 2.9/10 (active_learning 4.2 · checkpoint_quality 0.0 · scaffolding 5.0)
  • Model: 2026-07-survival-model-v2 / 2026-07-assumption-model-v2 (parameter hash 2024391902)
  • Limitation: synthetic results reflect explicit model assumptions; intervals exclude model and population-assumption uncertainty. Rates are not observed human outcomes.
Part Summary
Part Files Mean Score Std Dev
Part 1 — core path (lessons 00–14) 15 6.69 / 10.0 ±1.74
Part 2 — advanced (lessons 15+) 16 6.04 / 10.0 ±0.36
Overall corpus 31 6.35 / 10.0 —

No pages are classified as other.

Critical Findings
  1. Nearly all attrition is in Part 1 (steps 04–07). Step 07 (Write Your First Workflow, incl. 07d model access) has the highest conditional dropout (26.6%), driven by Copilot access/billing friction (3,693 failures) and workflow-authoring friction (2,273). The most important repair belongs to Part 1.
  2. Step 04 and Step 05 are the largest absolute drop-off sources (7,215 and 6,564 dropouts) from concept overload and concept gaps; they are also the lowest-scoring pages (5.39, 5.43) with active_learning 3.9 and 2.4. Beginners (0.6% success) and CCA-tool learners (8.4%) are hit hardest; UI-preferring learners average 11.3% vs 32.3%.
  3. Learning quality health is weak: KPI index 2.9/10. checkpoint_quality is 0.0 on every step even though pages end with a checkpoint section, so the rubric likely sees checkpoints as unverifiable; learners who stay are not getting measurable skill checks.
  4. Step 08 shows 1.8% conditional dropout after the agent-insight rerun (down from 100% under the baseline's missing-lock-file assumption); the evaluated Step 07 pages confirm create, compile, and push of both files for the terminal path.
Top Repairs to Prioritize

Note: some dropout is expected. Repairs must maintain or improve the learning KPI index.

  1. Resolve the Step 07/07d billing contradiction (template adds copilot-requests: write, personal billing must remove it) and merge the duplicated access check (completion ↑ · learning KPI ↔/↑)
  2. Add practice and verifiable checkpoints to Step 05 with a prerequisite recovery path (completion ↑ · learning KPI ↑)
  3. Add hands-on practice and a self-check to Step 04 to cut concept overload (completion ↑ · learning KPI ↑)
Dropout by step
Step At-risk runs Dropouts Rate 95% interval Failure mode Top reason
07-first-workflow 22,399 5,966 26.6% 26.1–27.2% access barrier Copilot access missing (3,693)
05-agentic-intro 36,929 6,564 17.8% 17.4–18.2% learning barrier Agentic concept gap (4,311)
04-actions-intro 44,144 7,215 16.3% 16.0–16.7% learning barrier Concept overload (7,215)
05c-agentic-practice 30,365 3,749 12.3% 12.0–12.7% learning barrier Cannot classify agentic workflows (3,749)
05b-agentic-security 26,616 2,642 9.9% 9.6–10.3% learning barrier Security concept gap (2,642)
06-install-gh-aw 23,974 1,575 6.6% 6.3–6.9% access barrier Extension install friction (1,575)
Curriculum quality and learning KPIs
Step file Overall active_learning checkpoint_quality scaffolding KPI index Lowest dimension Priority
04-github-actions-intro 5.39 3.9 0.0 5.0 2.78 checkpoint_quality High
05-agentic-workflows-intro 5.43 2.4 0.0 5.0 2.24 checkpoint_quality High
07-your-first-workflow 6.25 6.3 0.0 5.0 3.65 checkpoint_quality High (access)
08-run-your-workflow 5.67 3.0 0.0 5.0 2.45 checkpoint_quality Medium
Cohort mean (31 steps) 6.35 4.15 0.0 5.0 2.87 checkpoint_quality —
Segment breakdowns
Level Mean success n
beginner 0.6% 11
github-basic 14.8% 19
actions-user 45.5% 11
advanced 46.9% 5
Personality Mean success n
curious 19.4% 15
confused 21.5% 6
skeptical 22.7% 7
methodical 24.7% 12
impatient 24.8% 6

Tool: CLI 34.5%, VS Code 28.2%, CCA 8.4%. UI-preferred 11.3% vs terminal-preferred 32.3%.

Notable student journeys (3)
  • Surprising success: Learner 024 (advanced, devops, UI-preferred, vscode) reaches 58.2% despite preferring the UI, showing the Codespace terminal transition is manageable with strong background.
  • Unexpected dropout: Learner 038 (beginner, no-coding, methodical, CLI) succeeds 0% of runs, failing at Step 04 from concept overload; being methodical does not offset the dense refresher with no hands-on practice.
  • Content gap: Learner 043 (github-basic, program-manager, CCA, UI-preferred) fails at Step 04; the page gives no reduced-path or checkpoint for learners without YAML background.

Generated by 🔬 Workshop Student Simulator · copilot · auto · ~41 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 15.4K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 26, 2026, 8:04 AM UTC
Ngôn ngữ chính
JavaScript
Star
55
Fork
36
Merge trung bình
2 ngày 8 giờ
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
17

Chuẩn bị môi trường

Mở trong Codespaces

Khởi chạy dev container của dự án ngay trên trình duyệt, bằng tài khoản GitHub của bạn.

  • Không có Dockerfile hay tệp Docker Compose
  • Không có mẫu pull request
  • Không có hướng dẫn đóng góp

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

Tất cả issue của githubnext/gh-aw-workshop

Issue tương tự

Thêm issue về JavaScript

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.