Timeline: draw earlier retry attempts on the thread that ran them (retryAttempts[].threadId)
Chưa có ai nhận issue này.
Đánh giá
- Độ khó
- 4/5
- Thời gian dự kiến
- 3-5 ngày
- Mức phù hợp với người mới
- 55/100
- Loại issue
- Tính năng
- Độ rõ ràng
- Đặc tả rõ ràng
- Mức độ hoạt động
- Sôi nổi
- Công nghệ
- node.js, typescript
- Lĩnh vực
- data-visualization, testing
Hướng nghiên cứu
Start with src/ctrf/timeline/collect.ts, especially readTests, arrange() and placeAttempts(), then review the timeline notes in src/ctrf/timeline/report.ts. Check the timeline tests and sample at ctrf-reports/timeline/ctrf-report.json; the issue does not name specific test files. Done when attempts with recorded threadId appear on their recorded worker, missing IDs retain current placement, and the docs and sample reflect the change.
Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.
Mô tả
Summary
CTRF 0.3.0 adds an optional threadId to attempt history entries (retryAttempts[].threadId), so each earlier attempt can record the thread or worker that ran it. The Test-level threadId now explicitly describes the final attempt. See ctrf-io/ctrf#74 and ctrf-io/ctrf#86, part of the 0.3.0 release tracked in ctrf-io/ctrf#75.
The timeline report (#279) should use it to draw each earlier attempt on the thread that actually ran it, and keep today's placement only for attempts that don't record a thread.
How it works today
Earlier attempts don't record a thread, so readTests gives every attempt its test's threadId, which is the thread of the final attempt (collect.ts#L353-L372). arrange() packs each thread's final results, and placeAttempts() tries to fit each earlier attempt into a gap on the first four lanes of that thread (collect.ts#L908, collect.ts#L1019). Attempts that fit nowhere go to a separate "Runs before a retry" lane, with a note that such runs do not record where they ran (report.ts#L748-L751).
When a retry runs on a different worker than the failed attempt, that guess is wrong in one of two ways:
- The attempt fits a gap on the final attempt's thread. It is drawn on a worker that never ran it, and nothing in the chart says so.
- It doesn't fit. It moves to the "Runs before a retry" lane, and the worker that actually ran it shows an idle gap at that time.
Either way, the tests drawn next to the failed attempt are the wrong neighbours. That matters most when looking for order-dependent or shared-state flakiness.
Proposed change
- Read the field. In
readTests, readattempt.threadIdwith the same normalization as the test's (normalizeThreadId) and keep it on the attempt. An attempt without one inherits its test's thread, as today, and is marked as inherited. - Place recorded attempts like final results. In
arrange(), put attempts with a recorded thread into that thread's group and pack them together with its final results. Only inherited attempts go throughplaceAttempts()and can end up in "Runs before a retry". - Keep overlap handling. The spec doesn't guarantee that a worker runs one test at a time, since some frameworks run tests concurrently within a worker. A recorded attempt that overlaps other tests on its thread splits the thread into extra lanes, as final results already do, instead of being moved out.
- Update the counts and notes. The stray-attempt note counts only attempts without a recorded thread, for which its wording stays true. Thread counts and the
maxLanescheck include threads that appear only in attempt history. - Types. The
ctrfpackage (0.5.0) typesAttemptHistoryEntrywithoutthreadIdand validates against spec 0.2.0. Until it ships spec 0.3.0, read the field through a narrow cast; then bumpctrfand drop the cast. Merging already keeps the field, becausemergeReportscopies tests as they are, but it can't validate such reports against 0.2.0, so the mergedspecVersionfalls back to the inputs' version. - Docs and sample. Mention attempt
threadIdin the timeline section ofdocs/report-showcase.md, and give the retried test inctrf-reports/timeline/ctrf-report.jsonan attempt on another worker.
Reports without attempt threadId render exactly as they do now.
How it improves the timeline
- Each earlier attempt is drawn on the worker that ran it, so per-worker busy and idle time is accurate.
- A failed attempt is shown next to the tests that really ran beside it on its worker. That is where order-dependent and shared-state flakiness shows up.
- A retry that moved to another worker is visible as such: the failed attempt on one row, the final attempt on another.
- A worker whose only results are failed attempts, such as one replaced after a failure, gets its own row. Today it doesn't appear.
- The "Runs before a retry" lane and its note remain only for reports that don't record attempt threads.
Dependencies
- ctrf-io/ctrf#86: the spec change, in the 0.3.0 stack (ctrf-io/ctrf#75).
- A
ctrfnpm release with spec 0.3.0, for the types. - Reporters that fill in
retryAttempts[].threadId. Until they do, the timeline stays as it is.
- Ngôn ngữ chính
- TypeScript
- Star
- 380
- Fork
- 43
- Merge trung bình
- 3 ngày 11 giờ
- Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
- 2
Chuẩn bị môi trường
Khởi chạy dev container của dự án ngay trên trình duyệt, bằng tài khoản GitHub của bạn.
- Không có Dockerfile hay tệp Docker Compose
- Không có mẫu pull request
- Đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp
Bắt đầu từ đâu
- Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
- Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
- Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
- Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.
Issue khác của ctrf-io/github-test-reporter
-
Độ khó 3/5 1-2 ngày Mức phù hợp với người mới 55/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#309 · 1 bình luận ·
-
Excessive memory usage when processing history leads to Javascript Heap ExhaustionCó thể làm lại được @HenrikDK đã nhận 121 ngày trước và không có pull request nào đang mở. Đang mở
Độ khó 4/5 3-5 ngày Mức phù hợp với người mới 48/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#302 · 2 bình luận ·
-
Độ khó 3/5 1-2 ngày Mức phù hợp với người mới 65/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#297 · 1 bình luận ·
-
Độ khó 5/5 Hơn một tuần Mức phù hợp với người mới 45/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#282 ·
-
Độ khó 3/5 1-2 ngày Mức phù hợp với người mới 48/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#258 · 1 bình luận ·
Tất cả issue của ctrf-io/github-test-reporter
Issue tương tự
-
b:minor bug
Độ khó 2/5 1-3 giờ Mức phù hợp với người mới 76/100
software-mansion/argent#1698 ·
Maintainer thường phản hồi trong vòng 1 ngày
-
e2e-failure ready-to-code
Độ khó 2/5 1-3 giờ Mức phù hợp với người mới 72/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugin-export-overlays#4624 · 1 bình luận ·
Maintainer thường phản hồi trong vòng 1 ngày
-
Độ khó 2/5 1-3 giờ Mức phù hợp với người mới 82/100
better-auth/better-auth#12132 · 1 reaction ·
Maintainer thường phản hồi trong vòng 1 ngày
-
automation missing-model model-sync provider:tinfoil
Độ khó 2/5 1-3 giờ Mức phù hợp với người mới 68/100
anomalyco/models.dev#12053 ·
Maintainer thường phản hồi trong vòng 1 ngày
-
o8 next debug build aborts on Glass to Dark appearance switch (nil identifier messaged before check)Đang mởbug
Độ khó 2/5 1-3 giờ Mức phù hợp với người mới 78/100
hurttlocker/o8#5112 ·