Timeline: draw earlier retry attempts on the thread that ran them (retryAttempts[].threadId)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 55/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- node.js, typescript
- Área
- data-visualization, testing
Línea de trabajo
Start with src/ctrf/timeline/collect.ts, especially readTests, arrange() and placeAttempts(), then review the timeline notes in src/ctrf/timeline/report.ts. Check the timeline tests and sample at ctrf-reports/timeline/ctrf-report.json; the issue does not name specific test files. Done when attempts with recorded threadId appear on their recorded worker, missing IDs retain current placement, and the docs and sample reflect the change.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
CTRF 0.3.0 adds an optional threadId to attempt history entries (retryAttempts[].threadId), so each earlier attempt can record the thread or worker that ran it. The Test-level threadId now explicitly describes the final attempt. See ctrf-io/ctrf#74 and ctrf-io/ctrf#86, part of the 0.3.0 release tracked in ctrf-io/ctrf#75.
The timeline report (#279) should use it to draw each earlier attempt on the thread that actually ran it, and keep today's placement only for attempts that don't record a thread.
How it works today
Earlier attempts don't record a thread, so readTests gives every attempt its test's threadId, which is the thread of the final attempt (collect.ts#L353-L372). arrange() packs each thread's final results, and placeAttempts() tries to fit each earlier attempt into a gap on the first four lanes of that thread (collect.ts#L908, collect.ts#L1019). Attempts that fit nowhere go to a separate "Runs before a retry" lane, with a note that such runs do not record where they ran (report.ts#L748-L751).
When a retry runs on a different worker than the failed attempt, that guess is wrong in one of two ways:
- The attempt fits a gap on the final attempt's thread. It is drawn on a worker that never ran it, and nothing in the chart says so.
- It doesn't fit. It moves to the "Runs before a retry" lane, and the worker that actually ran it shows an idle gap at that time.
Either way, the tests drawn next to the failed attempt are the wrong neighbours. That matters most when looking for order-dependent or shared-state flakiness.
Proposed change
- Read the field. In
readTests, readattempt.threadIdwith the same normalization as the test's (normalizeThreadId) and keep it on the attempt. An attempt without one inherits its test's thread, as today, and is marked as inherited. - Place recorded attempts like final results. In
arrange(), put attempts with a recorded thread into that thread's group and pack them together with its final results. Only inherited attempts go throughplaceAttempts()and can end up in "Runs before a retry". - Keep overlap handling. The spec doesn't guarantee that a worker runs one test at a time, since some frameworks run tests concurrently within a worker. A recorded attempt that overlaps other tests on its thread splits the thread into extra lanes, as final results already do, instead of being moved out.
- Update the counts and notes. The stray-attempt note counts only attempts without a recorded thread, for which its wording stays true. Thread counts and the
maxLanescheck include threads that appear only in attempt history. - Types. The
ctrfpackage (0.5.0) typesAttemptHistoryEntrywithoutthreadIdand validates against spec 0.2.0. Until it ships spec 0.3.0, read the field through a narrow cast; then bumpctrfand drop the cast. Merging already keeps the field, becausemergeReportscopies tests as they are, but it can't validate such reports against 0.2.0, so the mergedspecVersionfalls back to the inputs' version. - Docs and sample. Mention attempt
threadIdin the timeline section ofdocs/report-showcase.md, and give the retried test inctrf-reports/timeline/ctrf-report.jsonan attempt on another worker.
Reports without attempt threadId render exactly as they do now.
How it improves the timeline
- Each earlier attempt is drawn on the worker that ran it, so per-worker busy and idle time is accurate.
- A failed attempt is shown next to the tests that really ran beside it on its worker. That is where order-dependent and shared-state flakiness shows up.
- A retry that moved to another worker is visible as such: the failed attempt on one row, the final attempt on another.
- A worker whose only results are failed attempts, such as one replaced after a failure, gets its own row. Today it doesn't appear.
- The "Runs before a retry" lane and its note remain only for reports that don't record attempt threads.
Dependencies
- ctrf-io/ctrf#86: the spec change, in the 0.3.0 stack (ctrf-io/ctrf#75).
- A
ctrfnpm release with spec 0.3.0, for the types. - Reporters that fill in
retryAttempts[].threadId. Until they do, the timeline stays as it is.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 380
- Forks
- 43
- Merge medio
- 3 d 11 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de ctrf-io/github-test-reporter
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#309 · 1 comentario ·
-
Excessive memory usage when processing history leads to Javascript Heap ExhaustionQuizá libre de nuevo @HenrikDK la tomó hace 121 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#302 · 2 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#297 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#282 ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
ctrf-io/github-test-reporter#258 · 1 comentario ·
Todos los issues de ctrf-io/github-test-reporter
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
components-web-app/docs#307 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
localstack/localstack-mcp-server#112 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:frontend kind:bug priority:p1 ready
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug ready-for-agent
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
PhyberApex/kuroshiro#1687 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Performance (Web Vitals) collector: LCP/FCP from background tabs are not discarded, inflating p75Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
umami-software/umami#4720 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días