External HDD Won't Mount Despite Correct Password – Possible Interrupted Finalization (MountVolume:9553)
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- cryptography, security
Research direction
The issue provides no source files, tests, or code entry points to investigate. First establish whether this is a reproducible VeraCrypt defect or a user-support question; the report asks for diagnostic guidance and does not identify a code change or a testable expected result.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
External HDD – Correct password but volume won't mount (MountVolume:9553 / 4549)
Hello,
I need some help recovering access to a VeraCrypt-encrypted external HDD.
The HDD was encrypted with VeraCrypt on another Windows computer some time ago. I am now connecting the same physical HDD to a different Windows PC using a USB HDD enclosure.
VeraCrypt detects the disk/partition normally, but I cannot mount the volume.
I am confident that I know the correct password and, as far as I remember, the password has never been changed.
When I try to mount the volume, VeraCrypt reports:
Operation failed due to one or more of the following:
Incorrect password
Incorrect Volume PIM
Incorrect PRF (hash)
Not a valid volume
Source: MountVolume:9553
On another attempt, I also received:
Source: MountVolume:4549
There is one detail from the original encryption process that may be important.
As far as we remember, the actual encryption process reached the end. However, VeraCrypt was performing some kind of finalization/closing operation at the very end of the process, and it is possible that the program or computer was closed during that final stage.
I am not saying that encryption was interrupted halfway through while the disk was still being encrypted. My concern is specifically that the encryption itself may have completed, but the finalization/closing stage immediately afterward may have been interrupted.
Unfortunately, I cannot remember exactly what VeraCrypt was doing at that final point.
Could interruption at this stage cause the volume header or other VeraCrypt metadata to remain in an incomplete/inconsistent state and later result in the password/PIM/PRF/not-valid-volume error?
I would also like to rule out other possibilities, such as:
Volume header corruption
Different PIM or PRF/hash settings
Selecting the partition vs. the entire physical device incorrectly
VeraCrypt version compatibility
An older VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt format or algorithm
The USB HDD enclosure presenting the drive differently from the original SATA connection
Another mount option that may have been used when the volume was created
The data on this HDD is important, so I do not want to perform any operation that writes to or modifies the encrypted disk until I understand the problem.
What would be the safest diagnostic procedure in this situation?
In particular, is there a safe way to determine whether the primary/backup volume headers are valid, or whether the finalization stage of the original encryption was not completed, without modifying the disk?
If necessary, I can provide the VeraCrypt version I am currently using, Windows version, HDD/partition layout, and any other technical information needed.
Thank you for your help.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 11.7k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 28
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from veracrypt/VeraCrypt
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 32/100
veracrypt/VeraCrypt#1995 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
veracrypt/VeraCrypt#1993 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
veracrypt/VeraCrypt#1991 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in veracrypt/VeraCrypt
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug game: 01008BA02525A000 ios
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/ysql kind/bug priority/medium status/awaiting-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
yugabyte/yugabyte-db#37523 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 65/100
ly05010419/MacNativeGames#2079 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day