Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

set_key and unset_key don't fsync before replacing the .env file

Open
#713 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

@Imkkey is already working on this.

Since Oct 2, 2026.

  • #717 by @Imkkey — open

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
72/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
python
Domain
cli, tooling

Research direction

Start in src/dotenv/main.py at rewrite(), then trace its callers from set_key, unset_key, and the dotenv set/unset commands. Find the existing tests covering rewrite or key updates and add coverage that records fsync and os.replace ordering. Done means the temporary file is durable before replacement, with any directory-durability behavior covered consistently across supported platforms.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

enhancement

set_key and unset_key rewrite the .env file through rewrite() (src/dotenv/main.py): they write a temporary file next to the target, then os.replace it over the target. That makes the swap atomic for other processes, but nothing forces the new contents to disk before the rename. The temporary file is closed (which flushes Python's buffer to the OS) and then renamed, with no fsync.

What can go wrong

If the machine loses power or the kernel crashes shortly after set_key returns, the rename can reach the disk before the file's data does. After a reboot, .env can then be empty (zero length) or contain garbage, instead of holding either the old or the new contents. This applies to set_key, unset_key, and the dotenv set / dotenv unset commands.

How likely this is depends on the filesystem. ext4 with its default auto_da_alloc option flushes data before a rename that replaces an existing file, which covers this exact pattern. Other filesystems (XFS, and ext4 mounted with noauto_da_alloc) make no such promise, and a .env that has never existed before isn't covered by that heuristic at all. I haven't reproduced data loss; this is based on the documented semantics of rename(2) and fsync(2), and is the reason other write-then-rename implementations call fsync.

Since .env files often hold credentials, losing one silently is a bad outcome.

Proposed change

In rewrite(), before os.replace:

dest.flush()
os.fsync(dest.fileno())

This has to happen while the temporary file is still open, i.e. inside the with temp_file as dest: block, after the caller's writes have finished.

Optionally, after os.replace on POSIX, fsync the containing directory so the rename itself is durable:

if os.name == "posix":
    dir_fd = os.open(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(path)), os.O_RDONLY)
    try:
        os.fsync(dir_fd)
    finally:
        os.close(dir_fd)

Directory fsync isn't available on Windows, and some filesystems reject it with EINVAL. Since the file contents are already safe at that point, an OSError from it could reasonably be ignored.

Cost

.env files are small and set_key is not called in hot loops, so one or two fsync calls per write should not be noticeable. A test can check that os.fsync is called on the temporary file before os.replace, for example by patching both in dotenv.main and recording the call order.

Out of scope

Concurrent writers (two set_key calls at once can lose one update) and file-replacement side effects such as single-file Docker bind mounts are separate problems and not addressed here.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
8.9k
Forks
612
Avg merge
4d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from theskumar/python-dotenv

All issues in theskumar/python-dotenv

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.