Misdetection of 512Kbit breakout board?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- embedded-iot
Research direction
Start by comparing the detectMemorySizeBytes and getMemorySizeBytes entry points used by the examples, then inspect SparkFun_External_EEPROM.cpp around the reported write warning. Reproduce both examples with the 512Kbit breakout board and trace how the detected size is derived. Done means the examples consistently report the board's size and the compiler warning has been addressed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Subject of the issue
DetectSettings examples appear to mis-identify 512Kbit i2c breakout board.
I recently purchased (1) "SparkFun Qwiic EEPROM Breakout - 512Kbit" ( https://www.sparkfun.com/products/18355 )
After soldering the header on, I hooked it up to an Arduino Uno, installed the Sparkfun External EEPROM library (this one), and gave it a go.
The results:
17:49:47.133 -> Qwiic EEPROM example
17:49:47.133 -> Memory detected!
17:49:47.133 -> Detected number of address bytes: 2
17:49:47.133 -> Detected pageSizeBytes: 128
17:49:47.359 -> Detected page write time (ms): 2
17:49:47.390 -> Detected EEPROM size (bytes): 16 bytes / 128 Bits - 24XX00
My understanding is that I have the "24xx512" (2 address bytes, 128 byte page size).
These appear to be correctly detected.
However, the detection of the EEPROM size itself comes back what appears to be wrong as can be seen above.
I am powering the device over USB.
Then I tried example 7, which yielded:
17:53:02.652 -> Qwiic EEPROM example
17:53:02.652 -> Memory detected!
17:53:03.005 -> Detected pageSizeBytes: 128
17:53:03.232 -> Detected EEPROM size (bytes): 4096 bytes / 32 kBits - 24XX32
17:53:03.232 -> Checking memory: Good
17:53:03.457 -> I read (should be 200): 200
17:53:03.457 -> I read (should be -366): -366
17:53:03.457 -> I read (should be -7.35): -7.35
17:53:03.490 -> I read: Hi, I am just a simple test string
17:53:03.490 -> Next available EEPROM location: 105
This is detecting an EEPROM size of 4KB (24XX32).
Hence my confusion.
The former is using detectMemorySizeBytes and the latter is using getMemorySizeBytes.
It's not clear to me what the difference is.
Although unrelated, there is also a compile-time warning:
.../Arduino/libraries/SparkFun_External_EEPROM_Arduino_Library/src/SparkFun_External_EEPROM.cpp: In member function 'int ExternalEEPROM::write(uint32_t, const uint8_t*, uint16_t)':
.../Arduino/libraries/SparkFun_External_EEPROM_Arduino_Library/src/SparkFun_External_EEPROM.cpp:879:32: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
for (uint16_t x = 0; x < amtToWrite; x++)
~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 67
- Forks
- 23
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from sparkfun/SparkFun_External_EEPROM_Arduino_Library
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
sparkfun/SparkFun_External_EEPROM_Arduino_Library#41 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
sparkfun/SparkFun_External_EEPROM_Arduino_Library#36 · 2 comments ·
All issues in sparkfun/SparkFun_External_EEPROM_Arduino_Library
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
iOS: hidden scale bar invalidates its intrinsic content size on every layout pass of MLNMapViewOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
maplibre/maplibre-native#4723 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
HarbourMasters/Shipwright#7320 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Make Catch2 optional when `RDK_BUILD_CPP_TESTS=OFF`Possibly taken @pechersky claimed this today. Openbug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days