acl:accessToClass exclusion and pattern substitutes
@csarven is already working on this.
Since May 17, 2021.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
Can the spec editors elaborate on the exclusion (by design) of the acl:accessToClass predicate? Is it a problem of entailment? Are there substitute patterns for simplifying ACL structures in SOLID? We have an open issue on its support in a downstream spec, and would like to offer an alternative (or an explanation).
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 131
- Forks
- 29
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/web-access-control-spec
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#139 · 6 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#137 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#136 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#135 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#130 ·