Use WAC ontology for authorizing authentication
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- authorization
Research direction
Start by reading the linked authorization-panel discussion about using the WAC ontology to authorize authentication. The issue is ready for follow-up only once that discussion reaches consensus; done means reporting the agreed approach here.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I have opened a discussion in the authorization panel space https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/discussions/258 on the topic "Use WAC ontology for authorizing authentication". This issue here can then be used later to report on the consensus.
Tweet length summary:
One can use the WAC ontology to authorise Wallets to sign requests for particular resources.
That would reduce the need to have Access Control Resources specify lists of clients they want to allow access to, and also be bring together all the rules for user agents in one location.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 131
- Forks
- 29
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/web-access-control-spec
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#140 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#139 · 6 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#137 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#136 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/web-access-control-spec#135 ·
All issues in solid/web-access-control-spec
Similar issues
-
ai-driven-fuzzing bug claude Minor
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
linagora/cozy-client#1766 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug doc-audit
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
superradcompany/microsandbox#1974 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
opensearch-project/agent-health#603 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days