[Feature]: should you Keep a Changelog?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- documentation, release
Research direction
Start by reviewing the proposed CHANGELOG.md structure and the Keep a Changelog guidance linked in the issue. Clarify whether the initial change is only the changelog file or also the suggested slash-command automation; done means the agreed changelog approach is documented in the repository.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem Statement
Keeping a changelog seems reasonable.
Proposed Solution
Add a CHANGELOG.md.
https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/
Alternatives Considered
Use pure GitHub releases, no changelog as file.
Use Case
Describe the use case(s) this feature would enable:
- Getting to know the capabilites of the plugin. Changelog helps.
- Wanting to know if a recent change is maybe the cause of trouble people have.
Additional Context
I tried automating it with a slash command and the outcome is not the worst.
---
description: Analyzes recent git commits, determines version bump, and updates CHANGELOG.md following Keep a Changelog and Semantic Versioning guidelines.
subtask: true
---
Follow these steps to update the CHANGELOG.md file based on recent changes in the git history.
First, review the key guidelines from Keep a Changelog (https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/):
- Use CHANGELOG.md as the file name.
- Follow reverse chronological order with the latest version first.
- Each version entry: [version] followed by ISO 8601 date (YYYY-MM-DD).
- Include an [Unreleased] section at the top for upcoming changes.
- Sections: Added (new features), Changed (existing functionality), Deprecated, Removed, Fixed (bugs), Security (vulnerabilities).
- Best practices: Adhere to Semantic Versioning; keep human-readable; include release dates; make linkable; avoid empty sections; mark yanked releases.
Next, review Semantic Versioning 2.0.0 (https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html):
- Version format: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH (e.g., 1.2.3).
- Pre-release: Append -alpha.1 etc.; build metadata: +001 (ignored in precedence).
- Increment: MAJOR for incompatible API changes; MINOR for backward-compatible additions/deprecations; PATCH for backward-compatible bug fixes.
- Version 0.y.z for unstable initial development.
- Precedence: Compare MAJOR/MINOR/PATCH numerically; pre-releases lower than normal; compare pre-release identifiers lexically/numerically.
Now, analyze the project:
1. Get the current CHANGELOG.md content: @CHANGELOG.md
2. Identify the last released version from CHANGELOG.md or git tags: !git describe --tags --abbrev=0 || echo "0.0.0"
Let last_version = output of above.
3. Get commit messages since last version: !git log --pretty=format:"%s" ${last_version}..HEAD
If no commits, respond: "No changes since last version. No update needed."
4. Classify each commit message into categories (Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security). Use conventional commit prefixes if present (feat: → Added, fix: → Fixed, breaking: → Changed with MAJOR bump).
5. Determine version bump:
- MAJOR if any breaking changes.
- MINOR if new features (Added) but no breaking.
- PATCH if only fixes/changes without new features or breaking.
- If pre-release needed, append -alpha.1 etc. (decide based on stability).
Compute next_version by incrementing from last_version accordingly.
6. Group changes under appropriate headings. Omit empty sections.
7. Get today's date: !date +%Y-%m-%d
8. Decide on release strategy:
- For unreleased changes: Add or update the [Unreleased] section at the top.
- For a new release: Create new section ## [next_version] - today's_date
Add the grouped changes to the appropriate section.
If [Unreleased] exists, incorporate or replace it.
9. Preserve existing CHANGELOG content, inserting the new section after the header or updating [Unreleased] as appropriate.
10. Output the full updated CHANGELOG.md content.
If $ARGUMENTS provided, use it as additional changes or override (e.g., /update-changelog "Added: new feature").
Ensure the update is accurate, concise, and follows the guidelines exactly.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 594
- Forks
- 61
- Avg merge
- 13h 20m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from shekohex/opencode-pty
-
[Bug]: exit notification delivery failures are silently swallowed — agent never wakes, no diagnosticOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
shekohex/opencode-pty#54 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
shekohex/opencode-pty#48 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
shekohex/opencode-pty#67 · 2 comments · 1 reaction ·
-
bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 56/100
shekohex/opencode-pty#66 ·
-
[Feature]: Setting to have the web ui running even without /pty-... commandPossibly taken @kumar-shivang claimed this 16 days ago. Openenhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
shekohex/opencode-pty#60 · 3 comments ·
All issues in shekohex/opencode-pty
Similar issues
-
failed-test failure:ai-fixable failure:test-needs-update Team:One Workflow
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
elastic/kibana#295360 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
ehmpathy/rhachet-roles-bhrain#586 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
OHDSI/Data2Evidence#3496 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
apache/rocketmq-dashboard#5594 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
react-doctor severity:warning tech-debt
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 82/100
digidem/comapeo-cloud-app#418 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day