Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Guidelines for documenting intended vs actual behavior

Open
#2,037 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
rust
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Start by locating the authoring guide in the Rust Reference and review how it currently addresses intended versus actual behavior. Resolve the questions about known bugs, issue links, future-incompatible warnings, and unknown intent, then document the agreed guidance in the guide.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Authoring guide Meta

I think the authoring guide should have some guidance on whether to document the actual behavior of rustc vs the intended behavior, and how to handle known bugs.

If there is a known issue, should it be encouraged or discouraged to link to the GitHub issue?

Should it have specific callouts for future-incompatible warnings? How should these known problems be documented? Should it document how it is intended to work? What if the intention is not yet known?

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
1.6k
Forks
609
Avg merge
1d 4h
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from rust-lang/reference

All issues in rust-lang/reference

Similar issues

More Rust issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.