[Task][RFC]: Complete App conversations and reusable asynchronous work delivery
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 5/5
- Tempo estimado
- Mais de uma semana
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- python, typescript
- Domínio
- ai-infra-agents, backend-api-design
Direção de pesquisa
Read the linked RFC and coordinate with the existing owners of #4339 and #3786; the issue says implementation and integration overlap active work. Start by inspecting loopx/chat_server.py, loopx/control_plane/collaboration, and the personal-workspace dashboard entry point to identify an unowned acceptance gap before claiming work. Done means the agreed scope passes the listed journey checks and its integrated revision, commands, and test evidence are recorded here.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Outcome / 目标
让 App 会话完整承接异步工作。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.
Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S1/S3/S5 · R1–R3, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.
Current boundary
Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.
Conversation ingress and result-return work are partially shipped, including #5170. #5139, #5130 and #5106 are open at this audit for recovery and GoalRef integration; their changes are not assumed merged.
Work remaining
- Deliver the RFC’s nearest exit: an ordinary App request reaches a qualified existing owner, accepts correction, survives interruption and returns a checked artifact to the original conversation.
- Converge reusable inbox pending/replay/disposition rules in the existing TS owner while provider authentication, addressing and formatting stay in the adapter.
Ownership and ongoing work
Implementation is already active. Coordinate on the existing PRs instead of opening a competing inbox/session store. #4339 owns semantic handoff; #3786 owns shared presentation. This issue is the RFC-level delivery record.
Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.
Acceptance
- Test managed and attached entrypoints, reconnect, stop, duplicate delivery and a late return after the active session changes.
- Distinguish accepted, deferred, failed, running and delivered from actual receipts; no manual owner lookup or manual result relay in the qualified journey.
- Packaged frontend and CLI independently read back the same request, owner, revision, disposition and result.
- Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.
Starting points and delivery boundary
- loopx/chat_server.py
- loopx/control_plane/collaboration
- apps/presentation/dashboard/src/features/personal-workspace
Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 6.2k
- Forks
- 596
- Merge médio
- 6h 44min
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 915
Preparar o ambiente
- Sem Dockerfile nem arquivo Docker Compose
- Tem um modelo de pull request
- Ler o guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de loopx-project/loopx
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 84/100
loopx-project/loopx#6842 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
loopx-project/loopx#6108 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5688 · 2 comentários ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 60/100
loopx-project/loopx#5632 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5443 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Todas as issues de loopx-project/loopx
Issues semelhantes
-
documentation
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 67/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
good first issue module-baseline needs triage ux
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
darnitdevorg/darnit#650 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 65/100
nyjc-computing/campus#938 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
nf-osi/nf-metadata-dictionary#1027 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
bug documentation
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 92/100
qatrackplus/qatrackplus#913 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 3 dias