[Task][RFC]: Complete App conversations and reusable asynchronous work delivery
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- python, typescript
- Ambito
- ai-infra-agents, backend-api-design
Direzione di ricerca
Read the linked RFC and coordinate with the existing owners of #4339 and #3786; the issue says implementation and integration overlap active work. Start by inspecting loopx/chat_server.py, loopx/control_plane/collaboration, and the personal-workspace dashboard entry point to identify an unowned acceptance gap before claiming work. Done means the agreed scope passes the listed journey checks and its integrated revision, commands, and test evidence are recorded here.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Outcome / 目标
让 App 会话完整承接异步工作。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.
Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S1/S3/S5 · R1–R3, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.
Current boundary
Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.
Conversation ingress and result-return work are partially shipped, including #5170. #5139, #5130 and #5106 are open at this audit for recovery and GoalRef integration; their changes are not assumed merged.
Work remaining
- Deliver the RFC’s nearest exit: an ordinary App request reaches a qualified existing owner, accepts correction, survives interruption and returns a checked artifact to the original conversation.
- Converge reusable inbox pending/replay/disposition rules in the existing TS owner while provider authentication, addressing and formatting stay in the adapter.
Ownership and ongoing work
Implementation is already active. Coordinate on the existing PRs instead of opening a competing inbox/session store. #4339 owns semantic handoff; #3786 owns shared presentation. This issue is the RFC-level delivery record.
Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.
Acceptance
- Test managed and attached entrypoints, reconnect, stop, duplicate delivery and a late return after the active session changes.
- Distinguish accepted, deferred, failed, running and delivered from actual receipts; no manual owner lookup or manual result relay in the qualified journey.
- Packaged frontend and CLI independently read back the same request, owner, revision, disposition and result.
- Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.
Starting points and delivery boundary
- loopx/chat_server.py
- loopx/control_plane/collaboration
- apps/presentation/dashboard/src/features/personal-workspace
Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 6.2k
- Fork
- 596
- Merge medio
- 6h 33m
- PR unite (30g)
- 905
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di loopx-project/loopx
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
loopx-project/loopx#6842 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
loopx-project/loopx#6108 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5688 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 60/100
loopx-project/loopx#5632 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5443 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di loopx-project/loopx
Issue simili
-
idxmax/idxmin raise ValueError when a single partition is all-NAForse già presa @Jason10191019999 l’ha presa oggi. Apertaneeds triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Old versions of datamodelsApertabug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
-
[BUG]: Windows GUI package of v1.17.0-rc3 has no GTK DLLsForse già presa @andrut-ds l’ha presa oggi. Apertabug CI/CD Pactus-GUI Windows
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
pactus-project/pactus#2428 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
DiskDataset.reshard() can hang with a zero or negative shard sizeForse già presa @Programmer-Develops l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 19 giorni
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
GNS3/gns3-server#3017 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno