Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

Literal insert intermittently fails: the native window ID could not be read

Fechada
#18 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Um pull request relacionado já foi integrado.

  • #62 de @iamnbutler — integrado

Avaliação

Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
30/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
macos, swift
Domínio
desktop

Direção de pesquisa

The payload names only the desktop_insert tool, the LITERAL_INSERT_FAILED error, and the message "The native window ID could not be read", so start by finding where that error is raised and where the window ID is read before any input is posted. Decide first whether the read is transient; that decision picks the fix, either a retry before delivery or an outcome of refused instead of unknown. Done means the failure path reports the correct outcome and a test covers it, which likely needs a TextEdit window and maintainer input on the design.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

Found in the Ace desktop tools study (githubnext/ace#427). It happened twice in about 70 inserts into a TextEdit document, with no other interference.

Observed: desktop_insert returned outcome: unknown, consumption: unverified, LITERAL_INSERT_FAILED: "Background keyboard preparation did not finish; observe before another input." The cause was "The native window ID could not be read." The hint: "Observe the exact window again; no foreground fallback or guessed click is permitted." Nothing had been inserted either time, and the clipboard was restored. Each agent re-inspected and inserted once more, which worked.

  • D3c, Canary 0.0.46+684262d, line 9 of 15, window 11145. This was after the channel worker restarted, but several inserts had succeeded since.
  • D4, Canary 0.0.46+8fbfcc3, line 7 of 12, window 11314. Another channel's agent was working in a second TextEdit window at the same time.

Why it matters: each failure costs a re-inspect and a retry, and the outcome is unknown even though nothing was delivered. If the window ID read is transient, retrying it before any input unit is posted would keep the outcome exact. If it isn't transient, the refusal should say it happened before delivery (refused, not unknown).

Linguagem predominante
Swift
Estrelas
0
Forks
0
Merge médio
19min
PRs com merge (30d)
107

Preparar o ambiente

Este projeto não oferece contêiner de desenvolvimento, Dockerfile nem guia de contribuição, então a configuração fica por sua conta: comece pelo README e veja nosso guia da primeira contribuição para os passos gerais.

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de githubnext/desktop-tools

Todas as issues de githubnext/desktop-tools

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Swift

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.