Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

Literal insert intermittently fails: the native window ID could not be read

Chiusa
  • Qualcosa non va?
#18 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Una pull request collegata è già stata integrata.

  • #62 di @iamnbutler — integrata

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
30/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
macos, swift
Ambito
desktop

Direzione di ricerca

The payload names only the desktop_insert tool, the LITERAL_INSERT_FAILED error, and the message "The native window ID could not be read", so start by finding where that error is raised and where the window ID is read before any input is posted. Decide first whether the read is transient; that decision picks the fix, either a retry before delivery or an outcome of refused instead of unknown. Done means the failure path reports the correct outcome and a test covers it, which likely needs a TextEdit window and maintainer input on the design.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

Found in the Ace desktop tools study (githubnext/ace#427). It happened twice in about 70 inserts into a TextEdit document, with no other interference.

Observed: desktop_insert returned outcome: unknown, consumption: unverified, LITERAL_INSERT_FAILED: "Background keyboard preparation did not finish; observe before another input." The cause was "The native window ID could not be read." The hint: "Observe the exact window again; no foreground fallback or guessed click is permitted." Nothing had been inserted either time, and the clipboard was restored. Each agent re-inspected and inserted once more, which worked.

  • D3c, Canary 0.0.46+684262d, line 9 of 15, window 11145. This was after the channel worker restarted, but several inserts had succeeded since.
  • D4, Canary 0.0.46+8fbfcc3, line 7 of 12, window 11314. Another channel's agent was working in a second TextEdit window at the same time.

Why it matters: each failure costs a re-inspect and a retry, and the outcome is unknown even though nothing was delivered. If the window ID read is transient, retrying it before any input unit is posted would keep the outcome exact. If it isn't transient, the refusal should say it happened before delivery (refused, not unknown).

Lingua principale
Swift
Stelle
0
Fork
0
Merge medio
19m
PR unite (30g)
107

Preparare l'ambiente

Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di githubnext/desktop-tools

Tutte le issue di githubnext/desktop-tools

Issue simili

Altre issue su Swift

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.