False Negative: CloseSql.ql misses leaked JDBC resources once the allocation site is split across helper calls or `getResultSet()`.
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 4/5
- Tempo estimado
- 3-5 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 50/100
Direção de pesquisa
Comece com Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseSql.ql e compare seu tratamento da aquisição com os exemplos afetados PosCase1.java, PosCase6_Var3.java e PosCase6_Var4.java. Verifique se o checker relata a Connection vazada e ambas as instâncias de ResultSet obtidas indiretamente, preservando a cobertura existente.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseSql.ql - Checker description: This checker detects SQL resource objects (Connection, Statement, ResultSet) that are initialized locally and not guaranteed to be closed on method exit.
Description of the false negative
These cases still leak JDBC resources. One is the simplest possible leaked Connection. The other two leak ResultSet instances that come from a Statement parameter and are never closed before the method returns.
What changes between the samples is only how the resource is obtained: directly, through a helper method, or through Statement.getResultSet() after execute(...).
Affected test cases
PosCase1.java
The method opens a Connection and exits without closing it. This should be a baseline match for the rule.
PosCase6_Var3.java
The ResultSet comes back from a helper, but it still originates from the passed-in Statement and still leaks.
PosCase6_Var4.java
The ResultSet is retrieved through stmt.getResultSet() after execute(...). That is still a live SQL resource that needs to be closed.
Reproduction code
PosCase1.java
// Scenario 1: A java.sql.Connection is locally initialized, not assigned, not passed to a local constructor, has no parent, and is not closed.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.SQLException;
public class PosCase1 {
public void test() throws SQLException {
// Locally initialized Connection, assigned to a variable but not closed.
Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:example:db");
// No close() call before method exit.
}
}
PosCase6_Var3.java
// Scenario 6: A java.sql.ResultSet is locally initialized as a child of a non-locally-initialized Statement parameter, used directly, and not closed.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Statement;
public class PosCase6_Var3 {
public void test(Statement stmt) throws SQLException {
ResultSet rs = fetchResult(stmt);
// rs not closed
}
private ResultSet fetchResult(Statement s) throws SQLException {
return s.executeQuery("SELECT 1");
}
}
PosCase6_Var4.java
// Scenario 6: A java.sql.ResultSet is locally initialized as a child of a non-locally-initialized Statement parameter, used directly, and not closed.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Statement;
public class PosCase6_Var4 {
public void test(Statement stmt) throws SQLException {
boolean hasResults = stmt.execute("SELECT 1");
if (hasResults) {
ResultSet rs = stmt.getResultSet();
// rs not closed
}
}
}
Cause analysis
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseSql.ql appears to be tied too closely to one acquisition shape. It handles some direct JDBC constructions, but coverage gets weaker once the returned resource is produced through a helper or through a second-stage API like getResultSet().
That leaves a real blind spot. In production JDBC code, ResultSet objects are often obtained indirectly rather than from a single inline executeQuery(...) call. The leak is still the same: the method owns a SQL resource and does not close it.
- Linguagem predominante
- CodeQL
- Estrelas
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge médio
- 2d 16h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 143
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de github/codeql
-
agentic-workflows
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
-
false-positive
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
Todas as issues de github/codeql
Issues semelhantes
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 75/100
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 75/100
nightscout/nocturne#1424 ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Abertaarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
-
impl detach for native Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 65/100
paritytech/zombienet-sdk#591 ·
-
bug
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 75/100
mruangutai/harness#1897 ·