False Negative: CloseSql.ql misses leaked JDBC resources once the allocation site is split across helper calls or `getResultSet()`.
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 50/100
Línea de trabajo
Comienza por Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseSql.ql y compara su gestión de la adquisición con los ejemplos afectados PosCase1.java, PosCase6_Var3.java y PosCase6_Var4.java. Verifica que el checker informe de la Connection filtrada y de ambas instancias de ResultSet obtenidas indirectamente, preservando la cobertura existente.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseSql.ql - Checker description: This checker detects SQL resource objects (Connection, Statement, ResultSet) that are initialized locally and not guaranteed to be closed on method exit.
Description of the false negative
These cases still leak JDBC resources. One is the simplest possible leaked Connection. The other two leak ResultSet instances that come from a Statement parameter and are never closed before the method returns.
What changes between the samples is only how the resource is obtained: directly, through a helper method, or through Statement.getResultSet() after execute(...).
Affected test cases
PosCase1.java
The method opens a Connection and exits without closing it. This should be a baseline match for the rule.
PosCase6_Var3.java
The ResultSet comes back from a helper, but it still originates from the passed-in Statement and still leaks.
PosCase6_Var4.java
The ResultSet is retrieved through stmt.getResultSet() after execute(...). That is still a live SQL resource that needs to be closed.
Reproduction code
PosCase1.java
// Scenario 1: A java.sql.Connection is locally initialized, not assigned, not passed to a local constructor, has no parent, and is not closed.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.SQLException;
public class PosCase1 {
public void test() throws SQLException {
// Locally initialized Connection, assigned to a variable but not closed.
Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:example:db");
// No close() call before method exit.
}
}
PosCase6_Var3.java
// Scenario 6: A java.sql.ResultSet is locally initialized as a child of a non-locally-initialized Statement parameter, used directly, and not closed.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Statement;
public class PosCase6_Var3 {
public void test(Statement stmt) throws SQLException {
ResultSet rs = fetchResult(stmt);
// rs not closed
}
private ResultSet fetchResult(Statement s) throws SQLException {
return s.executeQuery("SELECT 1");
}
}
PosCase6_Var4.java
// Scenario 6: A java.sql.ResultSet is locally initialized as a child of a non-locally-initialized Statement parameter, used directly, and not closed.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Statement;
public class PosCase6_Var4 {
public void test(Statement stmt) throws SQLException {
boolean hasResults = stmt.execute("SELECT 1");
if (hasResults) {
ResultSet rs = stmt.getResultSet();
// rs not closed
}
}
}
Cause analysis
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseSql.ql appears to be tied too closely to one acquisition shape. It handles some direct JDBC constructions, but coverage gets weaker once the returned resource is produced through a helper or through a second-stage API like getResultSet().
That leaves a real blind spot. In production JDBC code, ResultSet objects are often obtained indirectly rather than from a single inline executeQuery(...) call. The leak is still the same: the method owns a SQL resource and does not close it.
- Lenguaje dominante
- CodeQL
- Estrellas
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 16 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 143
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de github/codeql
-
agentic-workflows
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
false-positive
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Todos los issues de github/codeql
Issues similares
-
ZCode 3.14.3 に対応する Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
supermomonga/zcode-acp#24 ·
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
learningequality/ricecooker#747 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
KhronosGroup/glTF-Blender-IO#2769 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100