Two Rust benches cannot link, so they can never run; the CI gate only type-checks them
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 4/5
- Tempo estimado
- 3-5 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Domínio
- build-system, ci-cd, testing-qa
Direção de pesquisa
Comece reproduzindo as falhas com cargo bench --manifest-path fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml --all-features --bench memory -- --test e com o comando equivalente do pipeline. Leia fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml, benches/memory.rs, benches/pipeline.rs e a etapa de CI adicionada por #500. Considera-se concluído quando o escopo escolhido estiver resolvido e ambos os benches forem executados com sucesso ou removidos, com a CI verificando os targets resultantes.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Found while verifying what remained actionable in #491. #500 fixed the bench compile errors and added a CI step that keeps them compiling, which holds — but "compiling" here means cargo check, and cargo check does not link. Two of the seven benches cannot produce an executable at all.
What happens
Each bench built individually, --all-features, on b85762dee:
connection_pool builds
core_benchmark builds
memory LINK FAILS
mutation_benchmark builds
pipeline LINK FAILS
query_execution builds
streaming builds
cargo bench --manifest-path fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml --all-features --bench memory -- --test:
mold: error: undefined symbol: PyUnicode_FromStringAndSize
mold: error: undefined symbol: PyEval_RestoreThread
mold: error: undefined symbol: _Py_Dealloc
>>> referenced 52 more times
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1
error: could not compile `fraiseql_rs` (bench "memory")
The five that build do run — cargo bench --bench core_benchmark -- --test reports Testing components/byte_reader_parsing … Success.
Why
Both failing benches, and only those two, call into the PyO3-dependent half of the crate:
// fraiseql_rs/benches/memory.rs:2, fraiseql_rs/benches/pipeline.rs:3
use fraiseql_rs::pipeline::builder::build_graphql_response;
pyo3 is declared with extension-module unconditionally (fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml:62), which tells it not to link libpython — the interpreter resolves those symbols at import time. Any target that produces an executable and actually references them therefore cannot link. It is the same constraint the comment above the CI build step already records for cargo test. There is no feature combination that avoids it: extension-module is on the dependency line, not behind a feature.
The other five link because nothing they call reaches a Python symbol.
Why CI does not catch it
The gate added by #500 is:
- name: Check all targets (benches and test binaries)
run: cargo check --manifest-path fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml --all-targets --all-features
cargo check stops after type-checking, so it validates that these two benches still match the API they call — the #471 drift problem, which it does solve — while never discovering that they cannot be executed. Adding --all-targets to the neighbouring cargo build step does not work either; that is exactly what #491 proposed, and it fails on memory, pipeline and the lib test target.
Scope
Both benches are declared with harness = false in Cargo.toml, so they are meant to be run. As things stand they are dead weight of the same kind as the test directories removed in #506: present, type-checked, and unrunnable.
Worth deciding rather than assuming: remove them, or move build_graphql_response behind a boundary the benches can call without dragging in PyO3. The second is only worth it if the pipeline builder is genuinely something we want benchmarked, which is a performance question, not a build one.
Credit to @Joemon24, whose #491 was pulling on this same thread — the benches not really being built — and whose PR is what prompted the check.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 23
- Forks
- 3
- Merge médio
- 30min
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 35
Preparar o ambiente
- Inclui um Dockerfile ou arquivo Docker Compose
- Tem um modelo de pull request
- Ler o guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Issues semelhantes
-
bug status/needs-triage
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 86/100
prowler-cloud/prowler#12887 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
area: desktop platform: macos priority: p3 status: ready type: enhancement
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 92/100
use-agent-os/agent-os#3484 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
bug
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 86/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python-contrib#5113 · 2 comentários · 2 reações ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
external
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 68/100
langchain-ai/docs#6255 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia