Two Rust benches cannot link, so they can never run; the CI gate only type-checks them
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Ambito
- build-system, ci-cd, testing-qa
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia riproducendo i fallimenti con cargo bench --manifest-path fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml --all-features --bench memory -- --test e il comando equivalente della pipeline. Leggi fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml, benches/memory.rs, benches/pipeline.rs e il passaggio CI aggiunto da #500. Il lavoro è completato quando l’ambito scelto è risolto ed entrambi i benchmark vengono eseguiti correttamente oppure rimossi, con CI che verifica i target risultanti.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Found while verifying what remained actionable in #491. #500 fixed the bench compile errors and added a CI step that keeps them compiling, which holds — but "compiling" here means cargo check, and cargo check does not link. Two of the seven benches cannot produce an executable at all.
What happens
Each bench built individually, --all-features, on b85762dee:
connection_pool builds
core_benchmark builds
memory LINK FAILS
mutation_benchmark builds
pipeline LINK FAILS
query_execution builds
streaming builds
cargo bench --manifest-path fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml --all-features --bench memory -- --test:
mold: error: undefined symbol: PyUnicode_FromStringAndSize
mold: error: undefined symbol: PyEval_RestoreThread
mold: error: undefined symbol: _Py_Dealloc
>>> referenced 52 more times
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1
error: could not compile `fraiseql_rs` (bench "memory")
The five that build do run — cargo bench --bench core_benchmark -- --test reports Testing components/byte_reader_parsing … Success.
Why
Both failing benches, and only those two, call into the PyO3-dependent half of the crate:
// fraiseql_rs/benches/memory.rs:2, fraiseql_rs/benches/pipeline.rs:3
use fraiseql_rs::pipeline::builder::build_graphql_response;
pyo3 is declared with extension-module unconditionally (fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml:62), which tells it not to link libpython — the interpreter resolves those symbols at import time. Any target that produces an executable and actually references them therefore cannot link. It is the same constraint the comment above the CI build step already records for cargo test. There is no feature combination that avoids it: extension-module is on the dependency line, not behind a feature.
The other five link because nothing they call reaches a Python symbol.
Why CI does not catch it
The gate added by #500 is:
- name: Check all targets (benches and test binaries)
run: cargo check --manifest-path fraiseql_rs/Cargo.toml --all-targets --all-features
cargo check stops after type-checking, so it validates that these two benches still match the API they call — the #471 drift problem, which it does solve — while never discovering that they cannot be executed. Adding --all-targets to the neighbouring cargo build step does not work either; that is exactly what #491 proposed, and it fails on memory, pipeline and the lib test target.
Scope
Both benches are declared with harness = false in Cargo.toml, so they are meant to be run. As things stand they are dead weight of the same kind as the test directories removed in #506: present, type-checked, and unrunnable.
Worth deciding rather than assuming: remove them, or move build_graphql_response behind a boundary the benches can call without dragging in PyO3. The second is only worth it if the pipeline builder is genuinely something we want benchmarked, which is a performance question, not a build one.
Credit to @Joemon24, whose #491 was pulling on this same thread — the benches not really being built — and whose PR is what prompted the check.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 23
- Fork
- 3
- Merge medio
- 30m
- PR unite (30g)
- 35
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Issue simili
-
Broken links found in docsApertadocs pydanty:is-working
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
pydantic/pydantic-ai#8863 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
run-llama/llama_index#23278 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
documentation from-review-extraction github-actions priority: low severity:nit
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 92/100
LearningCircuit/local-deep-research#6946 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
oracle/langchain-oracle#323 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 88/100
tenstorrent/tt-metal#58057 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno