`TransformResources.instance_count` rejects `ParameterInteger`, breaking parameterized instance counts in V3 Pipelines
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 2/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 82/100
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Clareza
- Claramente especificada
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- aws, python
- Domínio
- backend, machine-learning
Direção de pesquisa
Leia sagemaker-core/src/sagemaker/core/tools/constants.py e o gerador de shapes em sagemaker/core/tools/shapes_codegen.py. Adicione a sobrescrita da variável de pipeline TransformResources.InstanceCount descrita na issue, gere shapes.py novamente e verifique se a anotação gerada aceita IntPipeVar. A tarefa estará concluída quando a reprodução construir uma definição de pipeline com InstanceCount fazendo referência a MyInstanceCount.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
TransformResources.instance_count rejects ParameterInteger, breaking parameterized instance counts in V3 Pipelines
Describe the bug
In V3, a batch transform step inside a SageMaker Pipeline cannot have its instance count
driven by a pipeline parameter. Passing a ParameterInteger to
Transformer(instance_count=...) raises a pydantic ValidationError when the pipeline
definition is built.
The generated TransformResources shape annotates instance_count as a bare int, so
pydantic rejects any PipelineVariable:
class TransformResources(Base):
instance_type: StrPipeVar # pipeline-variable aware
instance_count: int # <-- not IntPipeVar
volume_kms_key_id: Optional[StrPipeVar] = Unassigned()
transform_ami_version: Optional[StrPipeVar] = Unassigned()
instance_type is StrPipeVar (Union[str, PipelineVariable]) and resolves correctly;
only the count is affected.
This appears to be an omission rather than an intentional restriction. shapes.py is
generated by sagemaker/core/tools/shapes_codegen.py, and the fields that should accept
pipeline variables are listed explicitly in PIPE_VAR_OVERRIDES in
sagemaker-core/src/sagemaker/core/tools/constants.py:
PIPE_VAR_OVERRIDES = {
"ResourceConfig": {
"InstanceCount": "IntPipeVar",
"VolumeSizeInGB": "IntPipeVar",
"KeepAlivePeriodInSeconds": "IntPipeVar",
"SelectedInstanceCount": "IntPipeVar",
},
"InstancePreference": {"InstanceCount": "IntPipeVar"},
"ProcessingClusterConfig": {
"InstanceCount": "IntPipeVar",
"SelectedInstanceCount": "IntPipeVar",
},
"ProcessingInstancePreference": {"InstanceCount": "IntPipeVar"},
# RandomSeed accepts a pipeline variable (e.g. a ParameterInteger) so tuning pipelines
# can parameterize reproducibility (issue #5614 / #6171).
"HyperParameterTuningJobConfig": {"RandomSeed": "IntPipeVar"},
}
Training (ResourceConfig) and processing (ProcessingClusterConfig) both have their
InstanceCount listed, but TransformResources has no entry. The net effect is that
within a single pipeline you can parameterize the instance count of a processing step or
a training step, but not of a transform step.
To reproduce
import boto3
from sagemaker.core.transformer import Transformer
from sagemaker.core.workflow.parameters import ParameterInteger, ParameterString
from sagemaker.core.workflow.pipeline_context import PipelineSession
from sagemaker.mlops.workflow.pipeline import Pipeline
from sagemaker.mlops.workflow.steps import TransformStep
session = PipelineSession(
default_bucket="example-bucket",
boto_session=boto3.Session(region_name="us-east-1"),
)
instance_count = ParameterInteger(name="MyInstanceCount", default_value=5)
instance_type = ParameterString(name="MyInstanceType", default_value="ml.c6i.8xlarge")
transformer = Transformer(
model_name="my-model",
base_transform_job_name="my-transform-job",
instance_count=instance_count, # ParameterInteger -> ValidationError
instance_type=instance_type, # ParameterString -> accepted
sagemaker_session=session,
output_path="s3://example-bucket/out",
)
step = TransformStep(
name="MyTransformStep",
step_args=transformer.transform(
data="s3://example-bucket/in", data_type="S3Prefix"
),
)
print(
Pipeline(
name="p",
parameters=[instance_count, instance_type],
steps=[step],
sagemaker_session=session,
).definition()
)
Result:
File "sagemaker/core/transformer.py", line 732, in _get_transform_request
"TransformResources": TransformResources(**resource_config),
pydantic_core._pydantic_core.ValidationError: 1 validation error for TransformResources
instance_count
Input should be a valid integer [type=int_type,
input_value=ParameterInteger(name='MyInstanceCount', ..., default_value=5),
input_type=ParameterInteger]
Replacing instance_count=instance_count with instance_count=5 succeeds, and confirms
that instance_type resolves correctly as a pipeline reference while the count is forced
to a literal:
{"InstanceType": {"Get": "Parameters.MyInstanceType"}, "InstanceCount": 5}
Expected behavior
The same definition that V2 produces, where both fields resolve to pipeline parameter
references. Running the equivalent V2 script on sagemaker==2.251.1:
{"InstanceCount": {"Get": "Parameters.MyInstanceCount"},
"InstanceType": {"Get": "Parameters.MyInstanceType"}}
In V2, Transformer.__init__ annotates the parameter as
typing.Union[int, sagemaker.workflow.entities.PipelineVariable], so this is a V2 → V3
regression.
Suggested fix
Add a TransformResources entry to PIPE_VAR_OVERRIDES in
sagemaker-core/src/sagemaker/core/tools/constants.py, alongside the existing training
and processing entries, and regenerate the shapes:
"TransformResources": {"InstanceCount": "IntPipeVar"},
This mirrors the fix already applied for HyperParameterTuningJobConfig.RandomSeed in
response to issues #5614 and #6171, which look like the same class of problem.
I verified the outcome by patching the generated annotation to IntPipeVar in an
installed 3.29.0 and re-running the repro above. It then produces a definition matching
V2 exactly:
{"InstanceType": {"Get": "Parameters.MyInstanceType"},
"InstanceCount": {"Get": "Parameters.MyInstanceCount"}}
I have not sent a PR since the change is to codegen input and requires regenerating
shapes.py, but happy to do so if that is useful.
Impact
This blocks migrating any pipeline that exposes transform instance count as a tunable
parameter. We have several such parameters, set per-run by operators to scale batch
transform jobs to the size of the input dataset. The only workaround is hardcoding the
counts into the pipeline definition, which removes per-run tuning and would require
redeploying the pipeline to change capacity.
Every other part of the V2 → V3 port works: once the counts are hardcoded, our pipelines
build on 3.29.0 and produce definitions with identical step names, step types, parameter
counts, and identical S3 artifact destinations.
System information
- SageMaker Python SDK version: 3.29.0 (
sagemaker-core2.29.0,sagemaker-mlops1.29.0) - Version that works: 2.251.1
- Framework / algorithm: batch transform (
Transformer) insidePipeline - Python version: 3.12.15
- pydantic version: 2.14.3
- Is the issue with a custom Docker image: no
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 1.3k
- Merge médio
- 2d 10h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 65
Preparar o ambiente
- Sem Dockerfile nem arquivo Docker Compose
- Sem modelo de pull request
- Ler o guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de aws/sagemaker-python-sdk
-
`HyperParameterTuningJob.create` rejects tuner tags on Python 3.14Talvez já em andamento Um pull request vinculado a esta issue está aberto ou já foi mesclado. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
aws/sagemaker-python-sdk#6554 · 2 comentários ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
get_base_python_image_uri() returns URIs for unsupported Python versionsTalvez já em andamento @Fire162 assumiu há 14 dias. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 74/100
aws/sagemaker-python-sdk#6539 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
[Bug] ModelTrainer with no input channels emits InputDataConfig: [], which CreatePipeline rejects (min=1) — v2 omitted the keyTalvez já em andamento @sagemaker-bot assumiu há 43 dias. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 76/100
aws/sagemaker-python-sdk#6156 · 2 comentários ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
sagemaker-train should depend on mlflow-skinny, following sagemaker-mlflow 0.5.0Talvez já em andamento @mohamedzeidan2021 assumiu há 44 dias. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 Meio dia Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
aws/sagemaker-python-sdk#6152 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
`ModelTrainer` bug with method to load hyperparameters from file for Amazon Nova RecipeTalvez já em andamento @sagemaker-bot assumiu há 43 dias. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
aws/sagemaker-python-sdk#5770 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Todas as issues de aws/sagemaker-python-sdk
Issues semelhantes
-
needs-triage
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
gke-labs/kube-agents#5671 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
docs(auth): Method B step 4 should tell users to tick "Use this client for an AI-powered agent"Abertadocumentation next-release v0.9.6
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
khuisman/mcp-gee-sweet#1446 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
In-box secret files written before their chmod: lc-creds, stacks tee, and the workspace tokenAbertamodel:sonnet runtime:claude security size:S
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 75/100
FootprintAI/Containarium#3671 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
HolidayBase: reassigning `language` does not re-initialize translations or re-populate holidaysTalvez já em andamento @shikhabhadoria assumiu hoje. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
vacanza/holidays#4116 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
bug CLI exec
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 84/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia