network-first: an eager Collection that last synced to zero rows stays loading offline
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 5/5
- Tempo estimado
- Mais de uma semana
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- sqlite, typescript
Direção de pesquisa
Start with the persisted-readiness oracle at packages/db-sqlite-persistence-core/tests/persisted-readiness-oracle.test.ts and the readiness rules in docs/guides/sqlite-persistence.md. The issue calls for deciding what evidence makes an empty restore safe and which events invalidate it; review the linked discussions #2203 and #2263 for prior design context. Done means the law and its authority are stated, generated history reaches an empty completed restore, the parent fails, the change passes, and a hostile mutant still rejects a cold empty cache.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Summary
With initialRender: { strategy: 'network-first' }, an eager persisted Collection whose last sync produced zero rows stays loading offline. It becomes ready only when the sync adapter answers. An offline app therefore cannot show "no rows" for a Collection that is truly empty.
This is documented, intended behavior today. The guide (docs/guides/sqlite-persistence.md, "These rules keep ready meaningful") says:
An empty restore waits for the network. The Collection stays
loadinguntil the sync adapter answers, so an empty list always means "no rows". A Collection that last synced to zero rows also waits, because the restore cannot tell the two cases apart.
This issue asks whether the law should change, and how.
The problem
An empty restore has two causes that the wrapper cannot tell apart:
- A cold cache that never synced. Showing it as
readyand empty is wrong. - A cache whose last completed sync produced zero rows. Showing it as
readyand empty is correct.
To open the second case offline, the wrapper needs evidence that a sync completed and that the empty row set is that sync's result.
Earlier proposal
#2203 proposed an adapter capability, isPersistedSnapshotComplete, that certifies a completed full snapshot with durable row-set evidence. That PR also covered Electric's progressive mode. #2263 solved the progressive case with per-demand coverage and no new adapter API, so #2203 was closed. #2203 did not address the eager empty case separately, and #2263 left it out of scope.
Questions for a design
- Can the wrapper record "a full sync completed in this cache generation" itself, as #2263 does for each demand, without a new adapter API? For example, record it when the adapter calls
markReady()after a complete snapshot and the rows are durably committed. - Which events end that evidence? Candidates are a truncate, a snapshot transaction, a cache-generation rotation, and a schema reset.
- Does an eager source's
markReady()always mean a complete snapshot, or only for some adapters?
Expected evidence for a change
The persisted-readiness oracle (packages/db-sqlite-persistence-core/tests/persisted-readiness-oracle.test.ts) owns this law. A change needs a stated law and authority, a generated history that reaches an empty completed restore, RED on the parent, GREEN after the change, and a hostile mutant that opens a cold empty cache.
Related
- #2202, fixed by #2263.
- #2102, design of safe offline subset reuse.
- #2203, closed.
- Linguagem predominante
- TypeScript
- Estrelas
- 4k
- Forks
- 280
- Merge médio
- 1d 9h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 139
Preparar o ambiente
- Sem Dockerfile nem arquivo Docker Compose
- Tem um modelo de pull request
- Ler o guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de TanStack/db
-
Dificuldade 1/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromisesTalvez livre de novo @Claire-ovo assumiu há 12 dias e não há nenhum pull request aberto. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
TanStack/db#2254 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Two @tanstack/db tests time out under CPU load because a cold module import counts against the 5 s default timeoutTalvez já em andamento @jp-knj assumiu há 10 dias. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 48/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Todas as issues de TanStack/db
Issues semelhantes
-
bug
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
pending close triaging
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
anomalyco/opencode#62582 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
feature request
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
callstack/react-native-paper#5189 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 68/100
live-codes/livecodes#1079 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Add: ESP 2 ROAbertaapproved check:passed streams:add
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 66/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia