epic: content layer — Helia in the browser, Kubo as the platform node, Boxo where needed
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 5/5
- Tempo estimado
- Mais de uma semana
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- python
- Domínio
- data, distributed-systems, infrastructure
Direção de pesquisa
Start with docs/HELIA_INTEGRATION.md and the linked child issues to understand the planned content layer; this epic groups browser Helia, platform Kubo, optional Boxo work, and separate Stripe work. The production host, Kubo version policy, and need for custom Boxo code are still open. Done means the scoped child issues are completed and those design questions are resolved.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Summary
Track the content layer for distributed-quantum: Helia in the browser for content addressing, Kubo as the always-on platform node, and Boxo (Go library) only where Kubo cannot meet a need. Also tracks Stripe stablecoin work as a separate group.
Source material: the Helia integration overview (docs/HELIA_INTEGRATION.md, added separately).
Design stance
- Compute and content stay separate planes. Content-layer failures never block or discard quantum execution.
- Prefer configuring Kubo over writing Go. Custom Boxo code needs a written justification (spike).
- Provider credentials move behind a server-side broker.
Open questions
- Where does the platform node run in production (hosting, who operates it)?
- Kubo version policy and upgrade cadence.
- Is a custom Boxo service justified? (see the Boxo spike)
Child issues
Tier 1 - good starting point (small, well-scoped, builds on existing code)
- #44
heliafix(vault): drain and replay the pin retry queue - #46
heliarefactor(vault-pinning): use the broker and remove NEXT_PUBLIC provider credentials - #47
heliachore(vault-pinning): remove the legacy nft-storage alias - #49
heliafeat(vault): publish circuits to the vault - #50
heliafeat(vault): versioned, validated record schemas - #51
heliafeat(vault): request persistent storage and warn about eviction - #53
heliatest(vault): unit tests for local-index and sync-queue - #56
heliadocs(helia): post the open design questions to the IPFS community and record answers - #68
kubotest(content-node): compose-based integration test for the Kubo client - #75
kubodocs(helia): add the content node to the architecture and target diagrams
Tier 2 - needs a new service, SDK or deeper design
- #45
heliafeat(vault): server-side pinning broker routes - #48
heliafeat(vault-pinning): pin original blocks as a CAR so the pinned CID equals the Helia CID - #52
heliafeat(vault): export and import the vault as a CAR file - #54
heliafeat(vault): open any CID from a link or paste, with trustless-gateway fallback - #58
heliafeat(vault): link runs to circuits with dag-json instead of a string field - #59
kubofeat(infra): run Kubo in docker-compose (server profile, pinned version) - #60
kubofeat(content-node): lock down the Kubo RPC API and gateway - #61
kubofeat(backend): async Python client for the Kubo RPC API - #62
helia/kubofeat(vault): platform Kubo node as a pinning provider - #64
helia/kubofeat(content-node): delegated-routing endpoint used by Helia - #65
kubofeat(content-node): reprovide only pinned content - #66
kubofeat(ops): Kubo storage limits, garbage collection and Prometheus metrics - #67
kubofeat(provenance): publish each provenance bundle to Kubo, best effort - #73
kubofeat(backend): Python gateway client that fetches by CID and verifies content - #74
kubofeat(provenance): IPFS storage adapter for bundle verification
Tier 3 - distinct stack or research; start with a small scoped deliverable
- #55
heliaspike(vault): one Helia node per browser (SharedWorker vs Web Locks) - #57
heliaspike(vault): large artefacts with UnixFS in an IndexedDB blockstore - #63
helia/kubofeat(content-node): browser-reachable multiaddrs for Helia nodes - #69
kubospike(content-node): Kubo pubsub bridged to py-libp2p GossipSub - #70
kubospike(vault): IPNS author feeds with Kubo-held keys - #71
boxospike(content-node): what Kubo cannot do, and whether a custom Boxo service is justified - #72
boxofeat(content-node): CID allowlist and takedown denylist for the public gateway
Ground rules: testnet-first, no secrets in the repo, tests and docs with every PR.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 2
- Forks
- 4
- Merge médio
- 6h 14min
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 18
Preparar o ambiente
- Inclui um Dockerfile ou arquivo Docker Compose
- Sem modelo de pull request
- Sem guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de QMeshPy/distributed-quantum
-
enhancement good first issue helia storage tier-1
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#53 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
chain-integration enhancement payments research-spike tier-2
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 55/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#78 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
chain-integration enhancement payments research-spike tier-2
Dificuldade 3/5 1-2 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 66/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#77 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
documentation good first issue kubo storage tier-1
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 42/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#75 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
enhancement kubo storage tier-2
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 56/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#74 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Todas as issues de QMeshPy/distributed-quantum
Issues semelhantes
-
type-bug
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
push_gh-pages fails on master branch on forksTalvez já em andamento Um pull request vinculado a esta issue está aberto ou já foi mesclado. Abertagood first issue infrastructure
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 76/100
kuznia-rdzeni/coreblocks#1135 ·
-
good first issue server
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 85/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
documentation priority: high
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
a-lex-s/mealie-telegram-bot#54 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia