epic: content layer — Helia in the browser, Kubo as the platform node, Boxo where needed
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- python
調査の方向性
Start with docs/HELIA_INTEGRATION.md and the linked child issues to understand the planned content layer; this epic groups browser Helia, platform Kubo, optional Boxo work, and separate Stripe work. The production host, Kubo version policy, and need for custom Boxo code are still open. Done means the scoped child issues are completed and those design questions are resolved.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Summary
Track the content layer for distributed-quantum: Helia in the browser for content addressing, Kubo as the always-on platform node, and Boxo (Go library) only where Kubo cannot meet a need. Also tracks Stripe stablecoin work as a separate group.
Source material: the Helia integration overview (docs/HELIA_INTEGRATION.md, added separately).
Design stance
- Compute and content stay separate planes. Content-layer failures never block or discard quantum execution.
- Prefer configuring Kubo over writing Go. Custom Boxo code needs a written justification (spike).
- Provider credentials move behind a server-side broker.
Open questions
- Where does the platform node run in production (hosting, who operates it)?
- Kubo version policy and upgrade cadence.
- Is a custom Boxo service justified? (see the Boxo spike)
Child issues
Tier 1 - good starting point (small, well-scoped, builds on existing code)
- #44
heliafix(vault): drain and replay the pin retry queue - #46
heliarefactor(vault-pinning): use the broker and remove NEXT_PUBLIC provider credentials - #47
heliachore(vault-pinning): remove the legacy nft-storage alias - #49
heliafeat(vault): publish circuits to the vault - #50
heliafeat(vault): versioned, validated record schemas - #51
heliafeat(vault): request persistent storage and warn about eviction - #53
heliatest(vault): unit tests for local-index and sync-queue - #56
heliadocs(helia): post the open design questions to the IPFS community and record answers - #68
kubotest(content-node): compose-based integration test for the Kubo client - #75
kubodocs(helia): add the content node to the architecture and target diagrams
Tier 2 - needs a new service, SDK or deeper design
- #45
heliafeat(vault): server-side pinning broker routes - #48
heliafeat(vault-pinning): pin original blocks as a CAR so the pinned CID equals the Helia CID - #52
heliafeat(vault): export and import the vault as a CAR file - #54
heliafeat(vault): open any CID from a link or paste, with trustless-gateway fallback - #58
heliafeat(vault): link runs to circuits with dag-json instead of a string field - #59
kubofeat(infra): run Kubo in docker-compose (server profile, pinned version) - #60
kubofeat(content-node): lock down the Kubo RPC API and gateway - #61
kubofeat(backend): async Python client for the Kubo RPC API - #62
helia/kubofeat(vault): platform Kubo node as a pinning provider - #64
helia/kubofeat(content-node): delegated-routing endpoint used by Helia - #65
kubofeat(content-node): reprovide only pinned content - #66
kubofeat(ops): Kubo storage limits, garbage collection and Prometheus metrics - #67
kubofeat(provenance): publish each provenance bundle to Kubo, best effort - #73
kubofeat(backend): Python gateway client that fetches by CID and verifies content - #74
kubofeat(provenance): IPFS storage adapter for bundle verification
Tier 3 - distinct stack or research; start with a small scoped deliverable
- #55
heliaspike(vault): one Helia node per browser (SharedWorker vs Web Locks) - #57
heliaspike(vault): large artefacts with UnixFS in an IndexedDB blockstore - #63
helia/kubofeat(content-node): browser-reachable multiaddrs for Helia nodes - #69
kubospike(content-node): Kubo pubsub bridged to py-libp2p GossipSub - #70
kubospike(vault): IPNS author feeds with Kubo-held keys - #71
boxospike(content-node): what Kubo cannot do, and whether a custom Boxo service is justified - #72
boxofeat(content-node): CID allowlist and takedown denylist for the public gateway
Ground rules: testnet-first, no secrets in the repo, tests and docs with every PR.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 2
- フォーク
- 4
- 平均マージ
- 5時間 19分
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 11
環境構築
- Dockerfile または Docker Compose ファイルあり
- プルリクエストのテンプレートなし
- コントリビューションガイドなし
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum のほかの issue
-
enhancement good first issue helia storage tier-1
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#53 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
chain-integration enhancement payments research-spike tier-2
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 55/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#78 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
chain-integration enhancement payments research-spike tier-2
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 66/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#77 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
chain-integration enhancement payments tier-2
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#76 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
documentation good first issue kubo storage tier-1
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 42/100
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum#75 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
QMeshPy/distributed-quantum の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
resource-submission validation-passed
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
hesreallyhim/awesome-claude-code#3214 · コメント 1 件 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
room-commons replace accepts an empty old string and silently prepends the new text to the pageオープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
doobidoo/mcp-memory-service#1650 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 1/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 82/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
ml-explore/mlx-lm#2002 ·
メンテナーはふだん 2 日以内に返信