Better support for imputed dataframe export
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100
Research direction
Start by reading rbmi::delta_template() and the related issue #494 about dataframe inputs to analyse(). Clarify whether ADMI flag creation belongs in rbmi or rbmiUtils, then define the supported dataframe/export behavior and tests needed to verify imputation-variable and method flags.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
(Note that this is kind of tangentially related to #494)
When creating the so called ADMI dataset (a CDISC style version of the imputed datasets) you often need to create flags to indicate which variables have been imputed and what imputation method was used to create them. Currently the only real way of doing this is to use (abuse?) rbmi::delta_template() and merge this information back on.
Though I guess alternatively this functionality might sit better with the rbmiUtils package, though on the other hand if we are going to provide direct support for dataframe inputs to analyse() (#494) then perhaps we should provide better support for creating said dataframes in the first place ?
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 21
- Forks
- 13
- Avg merge
- 13h 22m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from openpharma/rbmi
-
Release rbmi 1.7.1Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
openpharma/rbmi#606 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
To be evaluated
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
openpharma/rbmi#595 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
openpharma/rbmi#591 · 3 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Feature request: Add `analyse_mi_data()`.Possibly taken @danielinteractive claimed this 47 days ago. Openenhancement
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
openpharma/rbmi#589 · 8 comments · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
openpharma/rbmi#563 · 6 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
tidyverse/ellmer#1226 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Open-Systems-Pharmacology/OSPSuite.ParameterIdentification#377 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
cloudyr/aws.ec2metadata#16 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
hubverse-org/hubAdmin#187 · 1 comment ·